Talk:Pungency: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:37, 16 September 2012

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Food and drink Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Template:WikiProject MCB

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Beverages

Capsaicin-containing beverages were available before 2007. I have been drinking Goya brand Ginger Beer since around 1995. Barndoorsentry (talk) 23:02, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, some beverages list jalapeno oil in there ingredients. This jalapeno oil should contain capsaicin, as well, since it gives off the same sort of burning sensation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.8.225 (talk) 23:33, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing

Piquant and piquance is more used to describe a tart or acidic aspect to food. piquancy is used to describe the hot affect of food. I think we should clarify this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.204.130.177 (talk) 18:42, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

The request to rename this article to Pungency has been carried out.

If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag.

Piquance → Pungency –

"Pungency" is the correct technical term used by scientists: http://www.pnas.org/content/105/33/11808.abstract http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/279/1735/2012.full http://www.chilepepperinstitute.org/files/tiny_mce/file_manager/educ_info/Chile%20Terminology.pdf "Piquance" is nonsense because it's so rare that it's not even in most dictionaries. All dictionaries have "piquancy" and the examples and definitions of "piquancy" and "pungency" clearly show that "pungency" is correct and "piquancy" is something else. (See www.onelook.com) Espoo (talk) 16:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but not purely because pungency is the "technical term". I think of the two pungency is more used than piquancy and, as noted, piquancy is such a rare term that it can have different meanings. As the article describes, piquancy can be used to refer to foods that a mildy spicy. I think you were a bit hasty in changing the lead/introduction. I'd favour both terms being used, and I've amended it. -- Peter ^{Talk to me} 19:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 [[Piquance]] → {{no redirect|Pungency}} –
 * "Pungency" is the correct technical term used by scientists: http://www.pnas.org/content/105/33/11808.abstract http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/279/1735/2012.full http://www.chilepepperinstitute.org/files/tiny_mce/file_manager/educ_info/Chile%20Terminology.pdf "Piquance" is nonsense because it's so rare that it's not even in most dictionaries. All dictionaries have "piquancy" and the examples and definitions of "piquancy" and "pungency" clearly show that "pungency" is correct and "piquancy" is something else. (See www.onelook.com) [[User:Espoo|Espoo]] ([[User talk:Espoo|talk]]) 16:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
+::'''Support''', but not purely because ''pungency'' is the "technical term". I think of the two pungency is more used than piquancy and, as noted, piquancy is such a rare term that it can have different meanings. As the article describes, piquancy can be used to refer to foods that a ''mildy'' spicy. I think you were a bit hasty in changing the lead/introduction. I'd favour both terms being used, and I've amended it. -- [[User:Hazhk|Peter]] <sup>[[User talk:Hazhk|Talk to me]]</sup> 19:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC)