User talk:Shadowjams: Difference between revisions
Timothyhere (talk | contribs) |
Bobinisrael (talk | contribs) →Edit warring/vandalism on the Soledad O'Brien page.: new section |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
== Reference desk == |
== Reference desk == |
||
Ok. I'm sorry. I wasn't trolling. I suffer from an [[obsessive-compulsive disorder|OCD]]. Thank you. [[User:Timothyhere|Timothyhere]] ([[User talk:Timothyhere|talk]]) 12:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC) |
Ok. I'm sorry. I wasn't trolling. I suffer from an [[obsessive-compulsive disorder|OCD]]. Thank you. [[User:Timothyhere|Timothyhere]] ([[User talk:Timothyhere|talk]]) 12:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Edit warring/vandalism on the Soledad O'Brien page. == |
|||
It seems that you are some type of Wikipedia administrator with certain privileges. I am kindly requesting that you take a look at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Soledad_O%27Brien&diff=prev&oldid=513292209 my contribution] that is continually be deleted in bad faith. I believe that an honest evaluation of the language used in my edit is clearly from a NPOV. Moreover, the controversy WAS notable and is newsworthy, and relevant for the reader to glean a better understanding of this media personality. Beyond that, I am looking for some sort of assurance that the content will be protected from those who wish to erase it to fulfil a personal vendetta against me. There is absolutely no point in me engaging in this back and forth of deleting and replacing the content. Thanks in advance. [[User:Bobinisrael|Bobinisrael]] ([[User talk:Bobinisrael|talk]]) 15:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:17, 18 September 2012
Please start new threads at the bottom of the page and tell me what page or edits you're referring to if it's unclear. |
Last edited Tuesday 2012-09-18 3:17 pm UTC by Bobinisrael |
|
||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Evanna Lynch
You've threatened to block me for vandalizing a page for Evanna Lynch - but I haven't! I don't even know who she is and I have no idea how Wikipedia even works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.99.36.214 (talk) 10:46, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Animal sentinels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Spontaneous Human Combustion
Dear shadowwhoever. That was under unverified natural phenomenon and constructive or not it was well thought out and your exclusion of it not only displeased me , but kind of hurt my feelings. How do you know this is not true ? I was under the impression unverified meant -unverified (ʌnˈvɛrɪˌfaɪd) — adj not having been confirmed, substantiated, or proven to be true. So by my placement of my hypothosis about SHC, I do not see why it was removed. - unsatisfied wiki user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.103.53.167 (talk • contribs)
- This edit was not productive. If you keep messing with my talk page jacking up formatting, or if you continue to vandalize articles, you will be blocked. Shadowjams (talk) 22:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Wow . You are kind of like hitler of wiki . And a fun sucker. Feel free to block me jerk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.103.53.167 (talk • contribs)
^^Yea I've had a problem with these dykes before too. Shadowshit runs around with these guys called TideRolls and Mark Arsten. Can anyone say 3rd Reich?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.166.150.62 (talk) 00:09, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Payal Rohatgi
Hi I am Ms Payal Rohatgi .. My page URL is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payal_Rohatgi ... I have an uncorrect mention of my age on my page ... I would appreciate u could take my request to change it to 1984.. If u need relevant papers I can provide u that..someone is wrongly mentioning my age on Wikipedia and hampering my profile..please do the needful...u can contact me on payalrohatgi@hotmail.com if u need to speak to me for further details... Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.87.228.1 (talk) 04:32, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hello. We rely on reliable sources from third parties in order to establish facts on Wikipedia. This is why your changes, which were without explanation or a source, were undone. There is a large amount of vandalism on wikipedia that involves changing facts, especially dates. For that reason you need to find a third-party source that verifies the date you're trying to change it to. The article already has one source that lists a birthdate, so in the absence of another source, it should not be changed. Shadowjams (talk) 04:45, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- Looking at the history I also note that this is not the first time someone from your IP range has tried to make exactly the same change. Here, here, and here. Strangely there have been other changes to different dates. However the 1980 date is the only one supported by a source right now. Shadowjams (talk) 04:51, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- I've dug into the history more and I'm astounded at the duration of the fighting over this birth year issue. Because of that history I've removed the year, and referred the issue to the BLP noticeboard (I left a message at your IP page). Shadowjams (talk) 19:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Reference desk
Ok. I'm sorry. I wasn't trolling. I suffer from an OCD. Thank you. Timothyhere (talk) 12:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Edit warring/vandalism on the Soledad O'Brien page.
It seems that you are some type of Wikipedia administrator with certain privileges. I am kindly requesting that you take a look at the my contribution that is continually be deleted in bad faith. I believe that an honest evaluation of the language used in my edit is clearly from a NPOV. Moreover, the controversy WAS notable and is newsworthy, and relevant for the reader to glean a better understanding of this media personality. Beyond that, I am looking for some sort of assurance that the content will be protected from those who wish to erase it to fulfil a personal vendetta against me. There is absolutely no point in me engaging in this back and forth of deleting and replacing the content. Thanks in advance. Bobinisrael (talk) 15:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC)