Wikipedia:Confirmation bias bias confirmed: Difference between revisions
Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Confirmation bias bias confirmed. (TW) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{db-nonsense}} |
|||
{{mfd}} |
{{mfd}} |
||
{{Essay}} |
{{Essay}} |
Revision as of 17:39, 19 September 2012
This project page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a page that is patent nonsense, consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. This does not include poor writing, coherent vandalism and hoaxes (G3), coherent material not written in English, badly translated material, etc. This criterion also does not apply to pages in the user namespace. See CSD G1.
If this project page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message. Note that this project page may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation posted to the talk page is found to be insufficient.
Note to administrators: this page has content on its talk page which should be checked before deletion. Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google.This page was last edited by TenPoundHammer (contribs | logs) at 17:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC) (12 years ago) |
This project page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.
Please discuss the matter at this page's entry on the Miscellany for deletion page. You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move it, or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, see the Guide to deletion. Maintenance use only: Place either {{mfd}} or {{mfdx|2nd}} on the page nominated for deletion. Then subst {{subst:mfd2|pg=Wikipedia:Confirmation bias bias confirmed|text=...}} ~~~~ to create the discussion subpage. Finally, subst {{subst:mfd3|pg=Wikipedia:Confirmation bias bias confirmed}} into the MfD log. Please consider notifying the author(s) by placing{{subst:MFDWarning|Wikipedia:Confirmation bias bias confirmed}} ~~~~ on their talk page(s). |
This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
This page in a nutshell: D U C? |
A cadre of collaborative collectivists concurred conclusively that consensually compounded considerations coincidentally create comparatively cliquish communication construction characteristics, and correspondingly cause casual confluences of commentators to confidentially confess to conspiracy concerns - a curious construct considering comprehensibility could not be more concise.