Talk:Maggie Q: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:36, 3 May 2006

Maggie Q and David Lim?

The last sentence: maggie q is currently dating david lim. There is no punctuation... and is it actually true? Or did someone just put that down absurdly? I believe that there is editing needed for this article. But can someone please clarify? Everything looks fine except for that bizarre sentence.

I wouldn't consider Maggie Q a superstar. I wouldn't consider Daniel Henney a superstar. Maggie hasn't even had a leading role in a Chinese movie.

--Naked Weapon is something I would consider a leading role. She was a supermodel known in China and Japan, so even if she wasn't in films there at all, she still would be considered a superstar.

Revision as of 02:57, 28 April 2006 edit 68.174.18.100 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:36, 3 May 2006 edit undo 24.60.74.59 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I wouldn't consider Maggie Q a superstar. I wouldn't consider Daniel Henney a superstar. Maggie hasn't even had a leading role in a Chinese movie.		I wouldn't consider Maggie Q a superstar. I wouldn't consider Daniel Henney a superstar. Maggie hasn't even had a leading role in a Chinese movie.

			--Naked Weapon is something I would consider a leading role. She was a supermodel known in China and Japan, so even if she wasn't in films there at all, she still would be considered a superstar.