Talk:Misanthropy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:24, 25 September 2012

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Misanthropy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Philosophy

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Misanthropy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

Opening Paragraph

There is a weird parenthetical in the opening paragraph:

Misanthropy is a generalized dislike, distrust, disgust, contempt, or hatred of the human species. A misanthrope is someone (Alexis) who harbors those views and feelings. ...

Who is Alexis? and why is this the paraenthetical relevant here?

Front and Back clean-up

Effected a very conservative clean-up and expansion per the requesting tags. I didn't go into the inherently misanthropic nature of the Abrahamic religions, the lack of the concept in Chinese or other cultures not subject to that belief system, or other controversial but copiously sourcable currents. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 18:51, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I really wanted to pull the mention of "human nature" which is, as distinct from scientific studies of various aspects of human being, a bullshit concept dear to the ignorant and Conservatives, but didn't as I take impartiality and soforth seriously as an editor. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 18:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Names at the bottom of the article

GG Allin Boyd Rice Gregory House

I don't see why they should be there. It is well explained what a misanthrope exactly is, 'popular' examples aren't necessary - especially the 'Gregory House' entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.169.205.134 (talk) 10:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heidegger Mention

This assertion regarding Martin Heidegger: ...also showed misanthropy in his concern of the "they" — the tendency of people to conform to one view, which no-one has really thought through, but is just followed because, "they say so". Unlike Schopenhauer, Heidegger was opposed to any ethics or reason to treat others with respect.

This strongly worded and un-referenced. To be sure, I just read the entire Heidegger page and still find no text in tune with that statement. I think such a strongly opinionated statement should be referenced to some decent source material, otherwise it just sounds like someone had a axe to grind. I've known a few fellow students who loved reading Heidegger, and I never got that sense of them either.

If no reference can be found, at least the statement should be better explained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.189.245.231 (talk) 04:42, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant examples

Many examples of those hating humans are humans hating exclusively other humans. That's a different sentiment, and should not be mixed in. 24.85.161.72 (talk) 08:24, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 If no reference can be found, at least the statement should be better explained.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/207.189.245.231|207.189.245.231]] ([[User talk:207.189.245.231|talk]]) 04:42, 21 August 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Irrelevant examples ==
+Many examples of those hating humans are humans hating exclusively other humans. That's a different sentiment, and should not be mixed in. [[Special:Contributions/24.85.161.72|24.85.161.72]] ([[User talk:24.85.161.72|talk]]) 08:24, 25 September 2012 (UTC)