Jump to content

Talk:Gestalt psychology: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cetheriel (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


This article needs illustrations--crucial to teaching about Gestalt. Thanks! [[User:Dpr|Dpr]] 02:42, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This article needs illustrations--crucial to teaching about Gestalt. Thanks! [[User:Dpr|Dpr]] 02:42, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

=== the dog ===
sorry, maybe it's the size, but it took me a lot of time and effort just see there was a dog in the picture. try showing it around the size it is, on the monitor screen or showing bigger illustrations. that's because now that i know there is a dog there, i can find it, but until i read it, i couldn't tell what was in the picture. [[User:Cetheriel|capi]] 00:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


== Featured article ==
== Featured article ==

Revision as of 00:44, 4 May 2006

I'm just curious how anyone would relate Gestalt Psychology to ministry.

Shouldn't one spell Pragnanz correctly Prägnanz? It is still a German word and has not really become an English word. Any objections?

Please fix this page. I've tried fixing it but I don't have time to fine tune my mistakes. -Bhargav_mr 167.206.174.75 13:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC) Thanks -Bhargav_mr[reply]

Contributions

This article needs illustrations--crucial to teaching about Gestalt. Thanks! Dpr 02:42, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

the dog

sorry, maybe it's the size, but it took me a lot of time and effort just see there was a dog in the picture. try showing it around the size it is, on the monitor screen or showing bigger illustrations. that's because now that i know there is a dog there, i can find it, but until i read it, i couldn't tell what was in the picture. capi 00:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article

It's not there yet, but I think this one has featured article potential.

Prägnanz? - is there a missing law

I seem to remember that there were 7 laws, not 6. Wasn't there a 'Law of simplicity', whereby two overlapping silhouettes are still perceived as two shapes, rather than the single complex shape they make up? It's been a long time since I studied it, so I could be wrong. --HappyDog 14:26, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful tip

If you can't see the dog in the emergence test, pierce a small hole in a piece of paper and look through that. The paper masks everything from your peripheral vision so that your brain concentrates on the information in the picture. You'll then probably see the dog instantly. After that, you'll never be able to interpret the picture any other way. BrownBean 12:19, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

2/6/2006 Law of Simplicity is a combination of various laws, so it is not missing unless you want to go into detail. -a.