User:ComSpex

ComSpex was coined by a Japanese software programmer in 1988 in order to represent his software development profession after ComSpec which has been still used by Microsoft since MS-DOS era as one of the system environment variables under their operating systems.

Before you start writing to my talk page

ComSpex thinks of his talk page as a flower garden. He thinks of himself as an administrator of the garden.

ComSpex is a type of person who thinks etiquette is most precious in real life. However, his etiquette might not be always same as yours.

So, before you start writing something to his talk page, in order to stand on the common and fundamental ground for discussion, please read Wikiquette once again.

ComSpex always welcomes those who don't forget to say "Thank you" and "I'm sorry".

Impressive and/or memorable scenes for freedom

ComSpex respects your freedom and those who respect his freedom.

Here is a list of his favorite scenes from Wikipedia:

• Get off my talk page, both of you.

The moments when Wikipedia policies were born

Current State	New-born {{Policy}} State	{{Semipolicy}} State	The Inception
Neutral point of view	(2003-09-25 05:38:15) 2005-04-06 06:27:47		2002-02-26 00:51:15
Verifiability	2005-04-09 05:33:49	2005-04-06 05:53:45	2003-08-02 23:54:15
What Wikipedia is not	2005-05-12 20:50:56		2002-02-19 21:09:26

Links

• ja:Wikipedia
• ComSpex (meta)
• ComSpex (commons)

Philosophy

This user does not understand mean people. Please be nice.	METhis user uses Microsoft Encarta along with Wikipedia.
This user assumes good faith.	This user reserves the right to completely screw up their own edits.	PWDThis user supports Pure wiki deletion.
immThis editor is an immediatist.	exoThis editor is an exopedian.
This user would be a member of the AAW if they could be arsed about it.	The English Wikipedia has 6,937,919 articles.

This user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia. This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.