Jump to content

Talk:N-back: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 475881107 by Gwern (talk) experiment finished; thanks for cooperating, everyone
n-back... why?
Line 2: Line 2:





== Why are n-back tasks used? ==
The article only mentions that n-back tasks are used to "stimulate brain activity." For what end? Why are neuroscientists interested in this? [[User:Requiredforclass|Requiredforclass]] ([[User talk:Requiredforclass|talk]]) 19:44, 7 October 2012 (UTC)


== Software implementation ==
== Software implementation ==

Revision as of 19:44, 7 October 2012

WikiProject iconPsychology Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.


Why are n-back tasks used?

The article only mentions that n-back tasks are used to "stimulate brain activity." For what end? Why are neuroscientists interested in this? Requiredforclass (talk) 19:44, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Software implementation

The screen shot of the n-back task is for a commercial software sold by FingerFriendlySoft in the itunes store. It is there for the purposes of advertising and thus inappropriate. Moreover, the screen shot is uninformative with regards to the task, I am removing it. jben —Preceding undated comment added 10:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The text: "The suite of working memory training tasks used in the study on dopamine receptor levels is available from Pearson Education.[1]" has been removed because there are no reference to dopamine receptor previously.Ppaulojr (talk) 19:33, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted because your claim was incorrect. --Gwern (contribs) 22:45 7 July 2011 (GMT)