User talk:MaybeMaybeMaybe: Difference between revisions
Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
Can you correct the spelling please per [[WP:ENGVAR]]? --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 17:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC) |
Can you correct the spelling please per [[WP:ENGVAR]]? --[[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 17:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Fixing it now.[[User:MaybeMaybeMaybe|MaybeMaybeMaybe]] ([[User talk:MaybeMaybeMaybe#top|talk]]) 17:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:39, 11 October 2012
MaybeMaybeMaybe, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi MaybeMaybeMaybe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there! This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC) |
Category:LGBT comedians from England
Hi, Thanks for joining wikipedia and I hope you enjoy your time here.
I've nominiated for deletion here. This is on the grounds of the editing guideline Wikipedia:Overcategorization and Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality. As your new here you might not be up to speed with the many guidelines we have here and its worth familiarizing yourself with these. You are welcome to the discussion. It might be an idea to slow up on your categorisation work until the discussion has run its course, it would be a shame for your work to be undone.--Salix (talk): 19:03, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Hoaxes
Hoaxes like the addition of "He died June 2012 after duelling with a polar bear" to a biography of a living person are not funny at all. Even if you remove them yourself later. Don't do something like that again, please. Amalthea 18:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- I restored to an earlier version to remove other hoax material in the categories section etc and that was the last thing i noticed needing removed. Before I worked on the article it had far more hoax and joke material in it. Please check diffs before accusing.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 18:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Paul_Riley&diff=513215568&oldid=508627795
- Notice the difference. The fake/unsourced nick name and hoax/fake categories which you left in the article are now gone. MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- I see! My sincere apologies, absolutely my mistake! Amalthea 18:29, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
... for cleaning up month-old vandalism from an article (and then being accused of problematic edits for it). Apologies again! Amalthea 18:29, 17 September 2012 (UTC) |
- Thanks very much :) Just glad we got it all cleared up quickly.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 18:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Drawings by Leonardo da Vinci
I don't think that the creation of a separate category, at this point in time was a good move. There are very few individual drawings that merit a separate article., and carving them off from the category "Works by Leonardo da Vinci" is not a good way to go.
I want to comment that as a new editor, you need to confer with the regular writers of the articles before making a major change to their categorisation. A minor change would entail adding a work to an extra category such as Renaissance drawings of women (I don't know if such a category exists). But the major category in this case is obviously Works by Leonardo da Vinci, and you have set to and removed several works without, as far as I know, any discussion.
Amandajm (talk) 12:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Scrub this.
- I have observed that Drawings is coming up as a subcategory on the Works page. That's an OK solution! My apologies!
- Amandajm (talk) 12:08, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Glad everything is OK. I thought that when some were divided by medium there may as well be one for drawings arranged in the same way.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 12:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Sorry to revert your addition to Annie Lennox without any discussion. But facing similar problems of validity here, I was wondering if could you clarify whether or not you think that a WP:RS, in which a person is unambigously described as "androgynous", must be provided before that category can be added to their article. Thanks? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:31, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- I would say that I would judge it like other categories and say the main thing is that the category is backed up by text in the main body of the article. Would these be OK as refs to then add the category to Lennox?[1][2] MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 15:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'd be hard pressed to think of better ones. But my only gripe is that there should be no room for personal judgement - the description, together with sources like those two, should already be in the article. Many thanks. Annie sometimes looks more of a man that I'll ever be :( Martinevans123 (talk) 16:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Welcome
|
School rolls
Why add these? What do they add? And why add an incomplete one to the DGS page? Before adding them you should seek a consensus at the project, and work them up in a sandbox until they are reasonably complete. --John (talk) 20:48, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- As you have suggested Ihave moved the DGS table out and I am filling it out in a sandbox for now.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 21:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Category:Lesbian Asian Americans
Category:Lesbian Asian Americans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nymf hideliho! 06:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Category:Transgender and transsexual Asian Americans
Category:Transgender and transsexual Asian Americans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nymf hideliho! 06:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Category:Androgynous individuals
Category:Androgynous individuals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nymf hideliho! 06:56, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
CAT:Gay royalty
I have reverted 4 edits of yours adding a redlinked category while removing a bluelinked one which gives the impression of vandalism. You obviously are doing this as part of a largeer content effort. Please take some time to evaluate any feedback given in this area of content. Agathoclea (talk) 18:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Category:English people convicted of child pornography offenses
Can you correct the spelling please per WP:ENGVAR? --John (talk) 17:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Fixing it now.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 17:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)