Wikipedia talk:Historical archive: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
cleanup - remove items that are seemingly unrelated, perhaps test edits. Hard to determine, 4 years later. |
→Wikipedia:Lag redirect: agree |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Sounds sensible to me. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 08:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC) |
:Sounds sensible to me. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 08:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
::Thirded. —[[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] ([[User talk:Quiddity|talk]]) 20:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:05, 11 October 2012
- Archives for archive 1 works.
I hve redicit here but this rediciton was the archive below. So that the talk page was that archive. Those are not right. It should be these archives right. To a curret verzion page. I just get these redicits are broken.--70.225.141.61 (talk) 23:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm with you - I'm in a maze of redirects, trying to discuss Homer. Wikipedia has out-classed itself, and become an unindexed encyclopedia in its backwaters. No matter, it's all good.--LeValley 19:47, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Lag redirect
Wikipedia:Lag currently redirects to Wikipedia:Historical archive/Lag. However, I feel it would be better as a disambiguation page in the vein of WP:Dead and WP:DB, which in addition to Wikipedia:Historical archive/Lag links to documentation about database lag in the current MediaWiki software (mw:Manual:Maxlag parameter, mw:Manual:Database access, mw:Manual:$wgSlaveLagWarning etc.) Any suggestions/comments? SoledadKabocha (talk) 17:39, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sounds sensible to me. Graham87 08:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thirded. —Quiddity (talk) 20:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)