User talk:207.80.142.5: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:26, 15 October 2012

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 207.80.142.5, is registered to University of Texas System Office of Telecommunications Services and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Candiru. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Xy7 (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2008

Your recent edit to Geometry (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Vanderbilt University, you will be blocked from editing. Esrever ^(klaT) 04:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Joaquín Sorolla y Bastida has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Joaquín Sorolla y Bastida constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Joaquín Sorolla y Bastida. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Battle of San Jacinto, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Battle of San Jacinto was changed by 207.80.142.5 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-11T18:15:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mathew Rabey, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mathew Rabey was changed by 207.80.142.5 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-02-14T17:15:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to El Greco has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Salvador dali. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Salvador dali was changed by 207.80.142.5 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-11T18:36:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Third of May 1808. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tiddly-Tom 18:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The Third of May 1808. Tiddly-Tom 18:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 13:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Paula Deen, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 18:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Naruto characters, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 19:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to William Few has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DavidWS (talk) 15:54, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Bobby Johnson constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 16:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please do not make comments directed at another editor's personal dignity as you did here. If you repeat that, I will have no choice but to restrain you from making further unhelpful edits. Jehochman ^Talk 16:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You continued trying to harass the user, and discourage their participation in wikipedia via personal attacks. I've given you a 24 hour vacation from editing. Please consider that we are a collaborative project, not a battle zone. Jehochman ^Talk 18:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.80.142.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'd like to request unblock since I did not once make a personal attack. I made a comment of disapproval towards an editor's behavior, which in no way merits a block. Attempts to explain this to the blocking admin, User:Jehochman, were reverted and ignored, a classic case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. I suspect Jehochman has a WP:COI here in that he just doesn't like hearing any comment addressed towards his favorite admin User:Yannismarou that isn't "OMG IM SRRY DNT LEVE YANIS." Jehoch also failed to WP:AGF and deemed me a troll and cited WP:DENY when reverting a perfectly constructive post on his talk page that can't possibly be construed as "trolling I ask that WP:NPA reviewed and I'd also like to point out again that not once was a personal attack made. I believed Yannis' actions to be disgusting and detrimental to Wikipedia, and I stated my opinion (as other unbanned editors were already doing) on his talk page in the relevant section.

Decline reason:

Agree with block. — Cirt (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is this the only account you use to edit Wikipedia? You seem to know a lot about policy for a newcomer. Jehochman ^Talk 18:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is that intended to be mocking, or are you threatening to block whatever other account I may have? 207.80.142.5 (talk)

It is a serious question. Are you using an IP account so you can attack another user while keeping your main account "clean"? Jehochman ^Talk 18:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your actions Jehochman. I reverted this user as well on Yannis' page. The proposed edit is simply unacceptable. Dr.K. (talk) 18:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When somebody is feeling low, it is unacceptable to kick them, repeatedly and after being warned. Jehochman ^Talk 18:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. Thanks again. Dr.K. (talk) 05:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reblocked

I have reblocked this account, because it returned to the activities that got it blocking the first place. Additionally, this account is being used to evade a block that was placed on the user's main account. Talk to me before considering any unblocks. ~~I am intentionally not connecting this IP to the main account in public.~~ Jehochman ^Talk 14:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.80.142.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The edit* which I was blocked for is an encouraging message. It is not uncivil, it is not harassment, it is being genuinely nice. Jehochman didn't seem to consider this, and just decided to block me for even editing a talk page, probably assuming my edit was bad. If one argument can be made for the comment's apparent inappropriateness, I'll back off, but so far all I've gotten are template warnings and a "I agree with the block," which doesn't help me at all. By the way, the only reason I'm using this account is because A) the block on it ran out and B) I didn't want to leave on a negative note, and felt like I should have put a nicer thing on the talk page. I did so, and now I'm being crucified for being a nice guy. Sorry. Oh, and I can't talk to Jehochman before considering an unblock because he was so quick to block me, meaning I can't edit his talk page.

Decline reason:

Considering the tone of the message that got this IP blocked in the first place, the latest message comes off sounding entirely insincere and rather smarmy. That, in conjunction with the block evasion, calls for the IP to remain blocked. —Travis ^talk 19:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(* that edit is here) (talk) 18:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.80.142.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I shouldn't be blocked because some editors thought that a genuine, honest post was sarcastic. It's a lose-lose situation for me: if I'm sarcastic, I'm banned. If I'm honest, I'm seen as sarcastic and banned.

Decline reason:

Your requests for unblock have already been made, twice, and declined. Responsible administrators have reviewed the case, and upheld the decision. Please do not continue to make unblock requests; they will be denied. — Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 21:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion is not allowed, whether you are sarcastic or sincere. Jehochman ^Talk 20:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nothing has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —SMALL JIM 15:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Third Ward, Houston, you will be blocked from editing. Nabudis Shadow (talk) 14:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Informant has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 16:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Laws of Burgos has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 13:42, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to First Battle of Bull Run. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 21:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Peter Keinz, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A8 UDI 15:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to River Oaks, Houston. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 14:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Yates High School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 16:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jefferson Memorial has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy²⁰¹⁰ 15:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mount Vernon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mount Vernon was changed by 207.80.142.5 (u) (t) deleting 25343 characters on 2010-04-30T14:03:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Mount Vernon. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 14:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to The Star-Spangled Banner. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 14:59, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for two weeks

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism, for a period of two weeks.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

Daniel Case (talk) 15:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|violation This IP address is registered to an educational institution with over 600 students. The vast majority of the vandalism and unconstructive edits have been made by members of the schools middle school classes. We have talked to the students in their computer literacy courses regarding why vandalism of sources like wikipedia is inappropriate and unacceptable. While we know that standard procedure in these situations is simply for those with constructive input to register their own accounts, we feel that is not practical in this school environment, and unnecessary given the school's policies, and the maturity of the vast majority of the students. }

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Carson Cole has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Addihockey10 15:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Edwin van der Sar has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 14:14, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Brian Cushing has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Template:Z84 — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 21:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Kinkaid School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Shriram (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at S.C.I.E.N.C.E.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Shriram (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Smash Hits (song) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. --Lucas Nunes (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to S.C.I.E.N.C.E.. --Lucas Nunes (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Favonian (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Blocked for 3 months.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.80.142.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please include the original unblock request.

Decline reason:

The long history of abuse from this IP address does not warrant an unblock at this time. Please consider requesting an account, as logged in users are exempt from this IP block. --Chris (talk) 15:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.80.142.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is an open proxy vpn so it must be allowed

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TNXMan 18:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2012

Hello, I'm Thine Antique Pen. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Dijon, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dijon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishStephen (talk) 16:24, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dijon with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 16:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 172: / Line 172: @@
 [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Dijon]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning2 --> [[User:IrishStephen|IrishStephen]] ([[User talk:IrishStephen|talk]]) 16:24, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 :''If this is a [[open proxy|shared IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->
+<div style=clear: both></div>[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Dijon]] with <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dijon?diff=517954317 this edit]</span>, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]].<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:DVdm|DVdm]] ([[User talk:DVdm|talk]]) 16:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC)