Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nipponisation: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Akidd dublin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bookofjude (talk | contribs) →[[Nipponisation]]: weak keep |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Nipponisation]]=== |
===[[Nipponisation]]=== |
||
highly biased - neologism rarely used in french, should not be used for political reason. [[User:Akidd dublin|Akidd dublin]]•[[User talk:Akidd dublin|tl]]•[[User:Akidd dublin/contribution|ctr-l]] 09:03, 6 May 2006 (UTC) |
highly biased - neologism rarely used in french, should not be used for political reason. [[User:Akidd dublin|Akidd dublin]]•[[User talk:Akidd dublin|tl]]•[[User:Akidd dublin/contribution|ctr-l]] 09:03, 6 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
*Well, it appears to be a notable phenomenon, though I'm not sure if it's delving into the realms of original research, so '''Weak keep''' there. However, I fail to understand what its use in French has to do with it being encyclopedic, or what political reason would entail it being unused. [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not censored for political correctness]], after all. [[User:bookofjude|Jude]] <small>([[User_talk:Bookofjude|talk]],[[Special:Contributions/Bookofjude|contribs]],[[Special:Emailuser/Bookofjude|email]])</small> 10:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:19, 6 May 2006
highly biased - neologism rarely used in french, should not be used for political reason. Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 09:03, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it appears to be a notable phenomenon, though I'm not sure if it's delving into the realms of original research, so Weak keep there. However, I fail to understand what its use in French has to do with it being encyclopedic, or what political reason would entail it being unused. Wikipedia is not censored for political correctness, after all. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 10:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)