Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akatsuki leader: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:45, 6 May 2006

Akatsuki leader

Information is too vague to be of any importance. ~~May be an attack page~~ --so U m y a S ch 14:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since it lacks any useful information and its content is probably unsalvageable anyway. -- Grafikm_fr ^(AutoGRAF) 14:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Akatsuki (Naruto). However, I have no idea why this would be considered an attack page(?) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "Not much is known about this person except that he acts like the leader of the Akatsuki" (emphasis mine) - This gives the impression that it is a derogatory remark. I may be completely wrong though. --so U m y a S ch 14:18, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, This article doesn't give any intro to what the hell Akatsuki is to someone unfamiliar with the stuff. That's why I got confused into thinking this to be some political group. --soUmyaSch 14:21, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, but the article (and the picture) make it clear that it's talking about a fictional character: "...in the anime...", "...many fans believe...", "...of chapter 254..." and so forth. Pages about fictional characters should be NPOV just like any article, but they cannot by nature be attack pages. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment The picture wasn't there when I AfDed. And the intro was so incoherent that I did no dare read the entire article. --soUmyaSch 14:26, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - I think it's always a good idea to read the whole article before nominating/voting for deletion. In any case, thank you for retracting the attack page part. Do you also agree to the redirect? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:30, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No context, unsalvageable nonsense. -- Kicking222 14:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete I'm changing my vote (I couldn't figure out how to strike through my previous comment), as this was already deleted once today, and thus can be speedied by CSD G4. In addition, the original editor removed the AfD notice from the page. -- Kicking222 14:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing useful or encyclopaedic. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *****I think it's always a good idea to read the whole article before nominating/voting for deletion.  In any case, thank you for retracting the attack page part.  Do you also agree to the redirect? [[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 14:30, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' No context, unsalvageable nonsense. -- [[User:Kicking222|Kicking222]] 14:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
+**'''Speedy delete''' I'm changing my vote (I couldn't figure out how to strike through my previous comment), as this was already deleted once today, and thus can be speedied by CSD G4. In addition, the original editor removed the AfD notice from the page. -- [[User:Kicking222|Kicking222]] 14:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''', nothing useful or encyclopaedic. --[[User:Terence Ong|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e]]</font>[[User:Terence Ong|nc]][[User talk:Terence Ong|e Ong]] 14:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)