Talk:Balochistan, Pakistan: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Odd tone of article: new section |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Any questions/issues with the edits must first be addressed here (and not through blind reverts). |
* Any questions/issues with the edits must first be addressed here (and not through blind reverts). |
||
* A request for proper copy editing has been made [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Requests#Balochistan.2C_Pakistan here]. ~Cheers [[User:Samar|<font color="#367588" face="CommercialScript BT" size="4" >Samar</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Samar|<font color="#008080" face="Andalus" >Talk</font>]]</sup> 14:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC) |
* A request for proper copy editing has been made [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Requests#Balochistan.2C_Pakistan here]. ~Cheers [[User:Samar|<font color="#367588" face="CommercialScript BT" size="4" >Samar</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Samar|<font color="#008080" face="Andalus" >Talk</font>]]</sup> 14:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Odd tone of article == |
|||
Does it not appear that the article has an oddly mining industry/military strategy tone to it? Especially the economy section. Isn't the economy about how well people are doing, not about what the most recent local billion-dollar investment has been? Some changes along these lines had been made, but appear to have been all removed. |
|||
Suggested future changes: |
|||
Limit the discussion of natural resources to a single paragraph. There is much more that is interesting about Baluchistan. |
|||
When mentioning cities and people, let's avoid the use of words like "strategic". This isn't a board game. |
|||
How these changes can be made in a way that will withstand assaults from whomever removes such content: |
|||
Cite everything. |
|||
Check back again and again. |
Revision as of 21:08, 1 November 2012
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Balochistan, Pakistan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2 |
Pakistan: Balochistan C‑class Top‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Central Asia B‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Copy editing
- I have tried to fix the structure of the article according to this guide in my recent edits. No other extensive changing such as addition or removal of material have been made.
- Any questions/issues with the edits must first be addressed here (and not through blind reverts).
- A request for proper copy editing has been made here. ~Cheers Samar Talk 14:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Odd tone of article
Does it not appear that the article has an oddly mining industry/military strategy tone to it? Especially the economy section. Isn't the economy about how well people are doing, not about what the most recent local billion-dollar investment has been? Some changes along these lines had been made, but appear to have been all removed.
Suggested future changes:
Limit the discussion of natural resources to a single paragraph. There is much more that is interesting about Baluchistan. When mentioning cities and people, let's avoid the use of words like "strategic". This isn't a board game.
How these changes can be made in a way that will withstand assaults from whomever removes such content:
Cite everything. Check back again and again.
Categories:
- C-Class Pakistan articles
- Top-importance Pakistan articles
- C-Class Balochistan, Pakistan articles
- Unknown-importance Balochistan, Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Balochistan, Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles
- B-Class Central Asia articles
- Mid-importance Central Asia articles
- WikiProject Central Asia articles