Talk:Hand signals

In the US riders use primarily the left hand to signal intentions on a bicycle because the right hand is usually on the bike's rear brake lever? Is it different in the UK, using the right hand and leaving the left hand on the bicycle? Are the controls reversed, or is this simply because the two countries drive on opposite sides of the road? Should this discussion be added to the article? -Speedeep 15:34, Oct 31, 2004 (UTC)

Safety of extending right arm for right signal

I just removed the following paragraph which was added by User:slargy

Stephen G. Largy, Chair of the Mississauga Cycling Advisory Committee of Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; recommends the "left upper-arm out to the left, parallel to the road and angle your forearm vertically upward'" method for indicating a cyclist's right hand turn, as the only acceptable right hand signal method. This method recognizes that a bicycle is considered a vehicle of the road (thereby following automotive practice), however, and more importantly; the rider does not control the stopping option of the bicycle with their left hand (front brake). The sole use of the front brake for stopping severely reduces stopping ability, balance, and control. For safe and controlled cycling, use your left hand to signal all directional and stopping intent.

The reasons I am removing this paragraph are:

1. Apparently, Stephen Largy is inserting his own POV.
2. The reason using the right arm to signal right is not allowed in an automobile is because the right arm of the driver is inside the vehicle of a left-hand drive automobile. Allowing this method for bicyclists is not inconsistent with considering a bicycle to be a vehicle of the road. It's just logical.
3. Automatic turn signals are so ubiquitous on automobiles now that many people don't even recognize what a right turn signal with the left arm is. The meaning of a right turn signal with the outstretched right arm, however, is obvious.
4. The contention that "sole use of the front brake for stopping severely reduces stopping ability" is false. The League of American Bicyclists teaches in their education programs that the front brake provides 70% of the braking power. This is because applying either brake immediately shifts the weight forward and reduces the rear braking effectivity. For safe and controlled cycling, if both brakes are required, then neither hand should be used for signaling (a look back over the shoulder is a surprisingly effective substitute). But if you can afford to take one hand off, then removing the right hand is at least as good as removing the left.
5. Quoting an uninformed source, regardless of his credentials, is not appropriate.

--Serge 18:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Hand signals used by Car drivers and Military Hand signals?

It would be good to include these with pictures... I've failed to find anything on tinternet so far. --129.67.46.95 (talk) 12:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Front / Rear brake

"In many countries, the hand signal for stopping/braking requires that the cyclist signal with the hand used for the front brake, thus relying on the less effective rear brake to slow down."

When using the front brake, your bicycle can lift over to the front, so you should always use the rear brake. --80.187.103.149 (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

The front brake is what is going to slow you down. You will not be able to slow effectively using the rear brake. It is exceedingly difficult to flip a bike over the front wheel when braking, unless you make an undisciplined, caffeine-enhanced "Hulk Smash!" grab at the front brake lever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.153.101.8 (talk) 21:12, 1 November 2012 (UTC)