Jump to content

User:Requiredforclass/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
testing article in my sandbox
testing article in my sandbox
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
==Construct Validity==
==Construct Validity==
There is some question about the construct validity of n-back task. While the task has strong [[Face validity|face validity]]<ref name="Kane">{{cite journal|last=Kane, M.J., Conway, A.R.A, Miura, T.K., & Colflesh, G.J.H | Working memory, attention control, and the ''N''-back task: a question of construct validity|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|year=2007|issue=33|pages=615-622}}</ref> and is now in widespread use as a measure of working memory in clinical and experimental settings, there are few studies which explore the [[Convergent validity|convergent validity]] of the n-back task with other measures of working memory <ref name="Festinger1957"/>. Those studies have largely revealed weak or modest correlations between performance on the n-back task and performance on other standard, accepted assessments of working memory <ref name="Festinger1957"/><ref name="Jaeggi">{{cite journal|last=Jaeggi, S.M., Buschkuehl, M., Perrig, W.J., & Meier, B. | The concurrent validity of the ''N''-back task as a working memory measure|journal=Memory|year=2010|volume=18|issue=4|pages=394-412}}</ref>
There is some question about the construct validity of n-back task. While the task has strong [[Face validity|face validity]]<ref name="Kane">{{cite journal|last=Kane, M.J., Conway, A.R.A, Miura, T.K., & Colflesh, G.J.H | Working memory, attention control, and the ''N''-back task: a question of construct validity|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|year=2007|issue=33|pages=615-622}}</ref> and is now in widespread use as a measure of working memory in clinical and experimental settings, there are few studies which explore the [[Convergent validity|convergent validity]] of the n-back task with other measures of working memory <ref name="Kane"/>. Those studies have largely revealed weak or modest correlations between performance on the n-back task and performance on other standard, accepted assessments of working memory <ref name="Kane"/><ref name="Jaeggi">{{cite journal|last=Jaeggi, S.M., Buschkuehl, M., Perrig, W.J., & Meier, B. | The concurrent validity of the ''N''-back task as a working memory measure|journal=Memory|year=2010|volume=18|issue=4|pages=394-412}}</ref>
Discuss reliability.
Discuss reliability.


Revision as of 19:10, 6 November 2012

Construct Validity

There is some question about the construct validity of n-back task. While the task has strong face validity[1] and is now in widespread use as a measure of working memory in clinical and experimental settings, there are few studies which explore the convergent validity of the n-back task with other measures of working memory [1]. Those studies have largely revealed weak or modest correlations between performance on the n-back task and performance on other standard, accepted assessments of working memory [1][2] Discuss reliability.

[3]

Biggest Section

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec porta tellus nunc, vitae adipiscing diam. Vestibulum et dolor diam. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Cras et augue est. Donec condimentum, arcu congue porttitor egestas, lectus purus dapibus turpis, non tincidunt elit orci vel turpis. Proin luctus est vitae tellus varius id fermentum magna porttitor. Suspendisse quis risus vitae tortor fringilla dignissim et et lectus. Donec vehicula nunc at magna pretium viverra. Vestibulum lobortis eleifend luctus. Sed bibendum nisi vel tellus volutpat sed semper sapien consectetur.

  1. French Indian War
  2. Revolutionary War
  3. Civil War
  4. World War I
  5. World War II

[4]

Subsection

Cras rhoncus augue et justo pellentesque ullamcorper bibendum justo fermentum. Sed consequat eros et elit consectetur hendrerit. Donec sit amet dui diam, eget dapibus sapien. Praesent elementum volutpat elit, ut consequat elit cursus in. Quisque fringilla arcu quis augue posuere a fermentum libero convallis. Praesent ligula risus, condimentum quis dignissim non, bibendum at ligula. Curabitur non lacus ac lorem facilisis facilisis eget in justo. Integer blandit magna vel dolor facilisis mattis. Quisque est quam, convallis sed gravida eu, faucibus vel magna. Ut fermentum, nulla eu fringilla scelerisque, dui augue pharetra lectus, nec bibendum nisi odio at magna. Pellentesque non ipsum lorem. Sed tincidunt odio sed nibh ullamcorper vel interdum risus consequat. Praesent vestibulum, nulla vitae porta placerat, nunc leo placerat odio, non egestas lectus est id augue. Quisque libero urna, porttitor sit amet commodo at, laoreet ut neque. Phasellus feugiat diam sed ipsum rhoncus viverra. Donec urna dolor, gravida sit amet ornare id, eleifend id ipsum.

Subsubsection

Phasellus vel lorem ipsum. Aliquam quis arcu eget ligula pulvinar pellentesque. Nulla eget lorem magna. Aliquam condimentum imperdiet nulla, vel pellentesque purus consequat nec. Mauris eget libero nibh. Proin libero enim, pulvinar eu lacinia id, facilisis id lectus. Praesent posuere ante eget mi sagittis feugiat adipiscing quam pulvinar.

subsubsubsection aka SUBCEPTION

Sed pellentesque quam arcu. Duis nisi lorem, sodales quis viverra vitae, aliquam in nunc. Ut et feugiat risus. Pellentesque placerat, turpis ac cursus posuere, erat ante molestie est, eget iaculis enim ipsum vel purus. Aenean accumsan vehicula luctus. Proin et nibh sapien. Proin interdum facilisis ante eget adipiscing. Integer euismod ullamcorper enim, ac facilisis nunc cursus ac. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Ut sed eros at ante accumsan elementum id sed dui.

Eeeek

Mauris imperdiet ultrices nibh, nec pellentesque leo tempus sit amet. Maecenas semper commodo dui, quis molestie justo viverra eget. Donec condimentum magna vitae mi tempus varius. Proin molestie lorem felis, quis lacinia felis. Nullam fringilla condimentum aliquet. Integer facilisis volutpat risus id bibendum. Mauris iaculis mollis elit eget gravida. Proin pulvinar tincidunt est, eu bibendum ligula tempor et. Phasellus posuere velit et diam sollicitudin consequat. Vestibulum auctor velit id elit gravida eget lobortis erat fermentum.

  • German Shepherd
  • Great Dane
  • Golden Retriever
LIMBO

Nulla tincidunt libero a augue dapibus pharetra. Pellentesque non orci felis, quis sodales sapien. Nullam volutpat mauris in orci auctor sollicitudin vitae sed dolor. Nulla euismod urna tincidunt sapien vehicula feugiat. Duis pretium luctus dignissim. In bibendum, lectus id consequat lobortis, nisl neque pretium leo, nec egestas mi mi ut lacus.

References

  1. ^ a b c Kane, M.J., Conway, A.R.A, Miura, T.K., & Colflesh, G.J.H (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition (33): 615–622. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Text "Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity" ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ Jaeggi, S.M., Buschkuehl, M., Perrig, W.J., & Meier, B. (2010). Memory. 18 (4): 394–412. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Text "The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure" ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ Zanna, M., & Cooper, J. (1974). Dissonance and the pill: An attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(5), 703–709.
  4. ^ Levitan, Expansion of student learning via Wikipedia (2013). Digital Humanities Quarterly. 25 (3): 30–50. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Requiredforclass/sandbox&oldid=521710494"