Talk:William J. Seymour: Difference between revisions
Pmanderson (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
===Discussion=== |
===Discussion=== |
||
Note that [[William Kean Seymour]] is spelled out now; apparently following his own usage. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 22:14, 8 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:''Add any additional comments'' |
|||
Revision as of 22:14, 8 May 2006
This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.
 | Christianity Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Numerous William Seymours
It appears there are a number of Wikipedia articles about guys named William Seymour. There's this one (about the African American minister, as of 28 April 2006), plus:
- William H. Seymour
- William K. Seymour
- William Seymour, 2nd Duke of Somerset
- William Seymour, 3rd Duke of Somerset, and even a
- William Seymour Tyler
So it seems to me that the William Seymour page should be a disambiguation page, which would entail renaming (moving) this article about the African American minister. Assuming that were to happen, is there an article name that would be preferred by the editors who have been creating the present article? William Joseph Seymour? William J. Seymour? William Seymour (minister)? -- Muffuletta 23:04, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Requested move
William Seymour → William J. Seymour … Rationale: to allow William Seymour to become a disambig page -- Muffuletta 17:50, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Survey
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Support per above post -- Muffuletta 19:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support per above post -- David L Rattigan 19:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Discussion
Note that William Kean Seymour is spelled out now; apparently following his own usage. Septentrionalis 22:14, 8 May 2006 (UTC)