Talk:Pope Pius III: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:39, 8 May 2006

Does 1502 count as early renaissance in Siena? Ian Spackman 17:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good call: High Renaissance is the better designation. --Wetman 05:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Giuliano Della Rovere's support or opposition in the conclave? His article at Pope Julius II suggests opposition, here support. --Wetman 23:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 05:47, 16 February 2006 edit Wetman (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 92,066 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:39, 8 May 2006 edit undo Wetman (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 92,066 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Good call: High Renaissance is the better designation. --[[User:Wetman\|Wetman]] 05:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)		:Good call: High Renaissance is the better designation. --[[User:Wetman\|Wetman]] 05:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

			*[[Giuliano Della Rovere]]'s support or opposition in the conclave? His article at [[Pope Julius II]] suggests opposition, here support. --[[User:Wetman\|Wetman]] 23:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)