User talk:Cyclopia: Difference between revisions

Why did this need reverting? I suppose what I would really like answered is the second sentence of my edit summary. In other words, wouldn't it be more useful to link to the currently active merging process? If so, is the desired link Wikipedia:Proposed mergers or something else? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 02:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I ended up including links to both the current process and failed proposal; I hope this looks okay. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 03:25, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Historical stuff is useful too. It looks okay to me too now. Thanks. --Cyclopia ^talk 03:33, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

News and notes: First chickens come home to roost for FDC funding applicants; WMF board discusses governance issues and scope of programs

WikiProject report: In recognition of... WikiProject Military History

Technology report: Improved video support imminent and Wikidata.org live

Featured content: On the road again

Recent research: WP governance informal; community as social network; efficiency of recruitment and content production; Rorschach news

Cher#Plastic surgery

Hi. I'm wondering what should I do since Neosiber keep removing referenced and relevant information claiming it is "gossip". I don't want to start edit warring, especially because I nominated Cher for featured article. Could you help me? Lordelliott (talk) 08:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do. Thanks for the further heads up. --Cyclopia ^talk 14:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

Op-ed: 2012 WikiCup comes to an end

News and notes: Wikimedian photographic talent on display in national submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments

In the media: Was climate change a factor in Hurricane Sandy?

Discussion report: Protected Page Editor right; Gibraltar hooks

Featured content: Jack-O'-Lanterns and Toads

Technology report: Hue, Sqoop, Oozie, Zookeeper, Hive, Pig and Kafka

WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Songs

Popular 115

Hi! Some editors have been constructively editing "Element 115 in pop". Those were modest contributions, but much more can be done to the expansion of content and other improvements. Hopefully this will continue over the years as would be expected for any regular article. As you have been actively involved with the theme, your considerations would be appreciated (as usual). Eka-bismuth (talk) 13:45, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 267: / Line 267: @@
 </div>
 <!-- EdwardsBot 0399 -->
+== Popular 115 ==
+Hi! Some editors have been constructively editing "Element 115 in pop". Those were modest contributions, but much more can be done to the expansion of content and other improvements. Hopefully this will continue over the years as would be expected for any regular article. As you have been actively involved with the theme, your considerations would be appreciated (as usual). [[User:Eka-bismuth|Eka-bismuth]] ([[User talk:Eka-bismuth|talk]]) 13:45, 13 November 2012 (UTC)