New Relic: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Patent lawsuit further fleshed out |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* Automatic application discovery and instrumentation |
* Automatic application discovery and instrumentation |
||
==CA vs New Relic== |
==CA Technologies vs New Relic== |
||
On November 5 2012 CA filed a |
On November 5 2012 [[CA Technologies]] (formerly Computer Associates) filed a lawsuit in the US District Court for the Eastern District in New York. The lawsuit claims that New Relic violated three patents that came into CA Technologies' possession through acquisitions. The three patents in question are numbers 7,225,361 B2; 7,512,935 B1; and 7,797,580 B2.<ref>{{cite web|last=Morgan|first=Timothy|title=CA Technologies sues New Relic over APM patents|url=http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/06/ca_sues_new_relic_apm_patents/|publisher=The Register|accessdate=13 November 2012}}</ref> |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Revision as of 21:40, 13 November 2012
 | This article contains promotional content. (October 2012) |
 | |
| Company type | Private Company |
|---|---|
| Industry | Application performance management |
| Founded | 2008 |
| Headquarters | , |
Key people | Lew Cirne |
| Website | newrelic.com |
New Relic is an application performance management (APM) company based in San Francisco, California. Lew Cirne, known as the inventor of application performance management,[1] founded New Relic in 2008 and currently acts as the company's CEO.[2] New Relic's APM solution is delivered in a software as a service (SaaS) model.[3] New Relic's APM solution can monitor applications that are running in cloud, on-premise, or hybrid environments.
Technical Capabilities
New Relic currently provides the following APM capabilities:
- Performance Analytics: New Relic supports the following languages and frameworks with application agent technology: Ruby, Rails, PHP, Java, .Net, Python.
- Real User Monitoring: Monitors the page ready and loaded events critical to page performance and user perception, as well as derived network latency, with a tie back to the server-side transaction trace.[4][5]
- Server Monitoring: New Relic monitors the server resources with an operating system resident agent. Resources such as CPU, Memory, Disk and Network, of the servers running the application being managed [6][7]
- SQL/NoSQL performance monitoring
- Web application transaction tracing
- Thresholds and alert notifications
- Deployment history
- Availability monitoring
- Application architecture maps
- Scalability analysis
- Service level reports
- Java profiling
- Automatic application discovery and instrumentation
CA Technologies vs New Relic
On November 5 2012 CA Technologies (formerly Computer Associates) filed a lawsuit in the US District Court for the Eastern District in New York. The lawsuit claims that New Relic violated three patents that came into CA Technologies' possession through acquisitions. The three patents in question are numbers 7,225,361 B2; 7,512,935 B1; and 7,797,580 B2.[8]
References
- ^ Harris, Derrick. "Startup Strategies: How Lew Cirne Made New Relic a SaaS Success". GigaOM.
- ^ "http://www.crunchbase.com/company/new-relic".
{{cite web}}: External link in|title= - ^ "http://bizcloudnetwork.com/saas-apm-review".
{{cite web}}: External link in|title= - ^ Harris, Derrick. "New Relic Now Monitors User Experience in Real Time". GigaOM.
- ^ Taft, Darryl. "New Relic adds Real User Monitoring". eWeek.
- ^ Gohring, Nancy. "New Relic Now Monitors Server Performance". IDG News.
- ^ Harris, Derrick. "New Relic Adds Server Monitoring to its SaaS Mix". GigaOM.
- ^ Morgan, Timothy. "CA Technologies sues New Relic over APM patents". The Register. Retrieved 13 November 2012.