Talk:Super Smash Bros. (video game)

Consider this:

Since Super Smash Bros. contains the Pokémon franchise, I think that the upwards ring out into the background is derived from Team Rocket's infamous "launch into the sky and disappear as a little dot". Any thoughts? Oh, and I think the same goes for Melee as well. --Geopgeop 13:46, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

I don't think so. But that's me :P Adam Marx Squared 19:56, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

It's definitely not related. Andre (talk) 20:00, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

I improved the relevance and diction of the Character section, but I left the cleanup tag because it still needs work. Is all that stuff about the "pro circuit" really relevant to most readers? I think more specific info about items and attacks would be a big improvement.' 68.42.164.153 20:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Mothra?

Is it true that you can unlock Mothra? I don't think so myself, but at the time of my writing this, there is no refernce to the unlockableness of Jigglipuff.

Mothra instead of Jigglypuff? Whether this is not true or I have hallucinations. I have changed that lately, but some IP keeps including that. --Yuuki Mayuki 06:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Jigglypuff is unlockable (I have it on my game) but, Mothra is not. During the opening song it shows all the main characters in thier environment (or fighting someone else in thiers). Then thier is a flash of the silowettes (ceck speeling) of the unlockable characters. When you unlock a unlockable character it is no longer a sillwette but a plain character picture i have unlocked all the characters and there is no other silowette for Mothra.

P.S. What is Mothra?

H-BOMB 18:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Failed GA

Not having sources is enough to fail this article, but there are other problems:

• Story: One paragraph is not enough for a section. Additionally, it should not speculate. It may be enough to say, "The game's introductory video depicts Master Hand..." and not speculate as to whatever "story" the game has.
• Gameplay/General mechanics: One paragraph is not enough for a section.
• Gameplay/Controls: Wikipedia is not a how-to. The CVG project suggests that "if the content only has value to people actually playing the game, it's unsuitable." This entire section is game guide material, which doesn't belong here.
• Gameplay/Items: Again, too short for a section. Merge these three subsections together.
• Characters: An awful mess. The names of moves are guide material, and unsuitable. The charging nonsense is just that.
• Secret Stage: Not only is it one paragraph, it's the only bullet point there. Bullets are for lists, and lists have more than one item in them.
• Non-playable stages: A misnomer, since they are played in 1P mode.
• Criticism: One-paragraph section again, no references (which are vital to reception sections), and reads like an advertisement.

So! That's why you fail GA! Nifboy 00:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Criticism

This section is not notated very well (at all) and is very contradictory. It states that there is very little criticism, but goes on to say that many hated the simplified controls and 'outdated' graphics. If no one objects I'm just going to delete this section. --Thaddius 14:18, 9 May 2006 (UTC)