Talk:Dance Again... the Hits: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
DYKUpdateBot (talk | contribs) |
→Orphaned references in Dance Again... the Hits: new section |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
* '''Oppose''' per Status. — [[User:Tomica|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml"><font color="darkgreen">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font ></span>]] 12:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
* '''Oppose''' per Status. — [[User:Tomica|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml"><font color="darkgreen">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font ></span>]] 12:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[WP:move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> |
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[WP:move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> |
||
== Orphaned references in [[:Dance Again... the Hits]] == |
|||
I check pages listed in [[:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting]] to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for [[User:AnomieBOT/docs/OrphanReferenceFixer|orphaned references]] in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of [[:Dance Again... the Hits]]'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for ''this'' article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article. |
|||
<b>Reference named "Macpherson":</b><ul> |
|||
<li>From [[On the Floor]]: {{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/98d3 |title=Jennifer Lopez Love? Review |publisher=[[BBC Online|BBC Music]]. ([[British Broadcasting Corporation]]) |date=2011-05-03 |accessdate=2011-05-28 |last=Macpherson |first=Alex}}</li> |
|||
<li>From [[Love?]]: {{cite web|author=Alex Macpherson|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/98d3|title=BBC – Music – Review of Jennifer Lopez – Love?|publisher=BBC|date= 2011-05-03|accessdate=2011-05-03}}</li> |
|||
</ul> |
|||
<b>Reference named "Cinquemani":</b><ul> |
|||
<li>From [[I'm Into You]]: {{cite web |last=Cinquemani |first=Sal |title=Jennifer Lopez: Love? Music Review |url=http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/review/jennifer-lopez-love/2485|publisher=[[Slant Magazine]] |date=2011-04-29 |accessdate=2011-04-29}}</li> |
|||
<li>From [[Love?]]: {{cite web |last=Cinquemani |first=Sal |title=Jennifer Lopez: Love? Music Review |url=http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/review/jennifer-lopez-love/2485 |date=2011-04-29 |accessdate=2011-04-29}}</li> |
|||
</ul> |
|||
<b>Reference named "latimes":</b><ul> |
|||
<li>From [[Love?]]: {{cite news|url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2011/05/album-review-love-from-jennifer-lopez.html |title=Album review: 'Love?' from Jennifer Lopez |publisher=Latimesblogs.latimes.com |date= 2011-05-02|accessdate=2011-05-04}}</li> |
|||
<li>From [[RedOne]]: {{cite web|last=Ali|first=Lorraine|title=RedOne: Gaga, J.Lo, and Enrique may throw him props, but this musicmaker likes being the force behind the fame|url=http://www.latimesmagazine.com/2011/06/qla-redone.html|publisher=[[LA Times]] [[blog]]|date= June 2011 |accessdate=1 October 2011}}</li> |
|||
</ul> |
|||
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<font color="#888800">⚡</font>]] 10:00, 18 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:00, 18 November 2012
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dance Again... the Hits article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Dance Again... the Hits appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 July 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: article not moved Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 13:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Dance Again... the Hits → Dance Again... The Hits – Album title can be alternatively written as Dance Again: The Hits (like it is listed in Amazon), so may be the should be capitalized. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 07:59, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, obviously the context is that The Hits is not a part of a sentence, therefore it should be capitalized (ie. there could be a . or : after the word Again). --84.251.48.90 (talk) 19:23, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- That's what I'm talking about, thank you for your understanding. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 09:39, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per the official press release. What Amazon titles it is irrelevant. Saying it should be titled Dance Again... The Hits because Amazon calls it Dance Again: The Hits is WP:OR. Statυs (talk) 01:38, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- I also a user about whether or not there should be a space between the dots and whether or not "the" should be capitalized and this was the answer: [1]. Statυs (talk) 02:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per the link Status provided and MOS:CT. —Torchiest talkedits 02:33, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per the comment by Status. VítoR™ Talk That Shit 11:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Status. — Tomica (talk) 12:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Orphaned references in Dance Again... the Hits
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Dance Again... the Hits's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Macpherson":
- From On the Floor: Macpherson, Alex (2011-05-03). "Jennifer Lopez Love? Review". BBC Music. (British Broadcasting Corporation). Retrieved 2011-05-28.
- From Love?: Alex Macpherson (2011-05-03). "BBC – Music – Review of Jennifer Lopez – Love?". BBC. Retrieved 2011-05-03.
Reference named "Cinquemani":
- From I'm Into You: Cinquemani, Sal (2011-04-29). "Jennifer Lopez: Love? Music Review". Slant Magazine. Retrieved 2011-04-29.
- From Love?: Cinquemani, Sal (2011-04-29). "Jennifer Lopez: Love? Music Review". Retrieved 2011-04-29.
Reference named "latimes":
- From Love?: "Album review: 'Love?' from Jennifer Lopez". Latimesblogs.latimes.com. 2011-05-02. Retrieved 2011-05-04.
- From RedOne: Ali, Lorraine (June 2011). "RedOne: Gaga, J.Lo, and Enrique may throw him props, but this musicmaker likes being the force behind the fame". LA Times blog. Retrieved 1 October 2011.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:00, 18 November 2012 (UTC)