Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luna Nagai: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Mori5racing (talk | contribs) |
Mori5racing (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Delete'''. Not seeing sufficient third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage to verify notability or justify a biographical article. The corresponding Japanese Wikipedia article is actually even more poorly sourced. --[[User:DAJF|DAJF]] ([[User talk:DAJF|talk]]) 03:19, 27 November 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Not seeing sufficient third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage to verify notability or justify a biographical article. The corresponding Japanese Wikipedia article is actually even more poorly sourced. --[[User:DAJF|DAJF]] ([[User talk:DAJF|talk]]) 03:19, 27 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. Other than the source given above, sources don't seem to be forthcoming. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 10:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Other than the source given above, sources don't seem to be forthcoming. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 10:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
'''This site Should be approved'''I made many referenca newly about film and TV dorama.So this site should be approved. |
'''This site Should be approved''' I made links of many referenca newly about film and TV dorama.So this site should be approved. |
||
Revision as of 17:34, 27 November 2012
- Luna Nagai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP without verifiable and reliable independent third party sources with significant coverage. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 01:59, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Weak delete - I did find this regarding her retirement, but that's about all I found, and that doesn't satisfy WP:GNG in my book, therefore I must !vote delete. Go Phightins! 03:14, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Not seeing sufficient third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage to verify notability or justify a biographical article. The corresponding Japanese Wikipedia article is actually even more poorly sourced. --DAJF (talk) 03:19, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Other than the source given above, sources don't seem to be forthcoming. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
This site Should be approved I made links of many referenca newly about film and TV dorama.So this site should be approved.