Talk:Jab Tak Hai Jaan

Edit request on 17 November 2012

IANS Hindi Film Review has rated 4star to Jab Tak Hai Jaan. And quoting "Fall in Love with Love again!". Source-IANS Hindi Film Review, IANS Hindi Film Review Please insert in the (Section6 i.e. Critical Reception, Sub Section 6.2 i.e. INDIA) Professional Reviews Column with Review Scores. Please Edit it.

Professional reviews
Review scores
Source	Rating
Bollywood Hungama
IndiaWeekly
IANS
Filmfare
Zee News
One India
Koimoi
NDTV
The Times of India
India TV
Hindustan Times
CNN-IBN
DNA India
Digital Spy
Rediff †
The Indian Express
† indicates that the given rating is an average rating of all reviews provided by the source

SUMITKRISHNAGUPTA (talk) 11:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

First you have to provide a link and i dont know whether your reviews are from notable critics or not so, please consult {User:Secret of success}.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 19:47, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 17 November 2012

Jab Tak Hai Jaan` earns Rs.60.39 crore in four days <"http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/bollywood/jab-tak-hai-jaan-earns-rs-60-39-crore-in-four-days_122899.htm">

JAB TAK HAI JAAN EARNS WHOPPING RS 26 CRORES OVERSEAS<"http://www.deccanherald.com/videos/watch/2996/jab-tak-hai-jaan-earns.html"> 59.177.75.73 (talk) 18:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Just want the Conflicting reports section but it should be expanded.

India and Overseas critics review

Jab tak hai jaan mostly received positive reviews from critics in india.[1]

The film garnered positive reviews from overseas critics as well.[2]

Kindly note that it is written that it received mostly positive reviews from critics in india. so it would be wrong to say it received positive to mixed reviews as only 1 out of 15 reviews mentioned in the table here also gave less than 3 stars. its my humble request to pay attention to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voiceinside19 (talk • contribs)

Your references are blogs and reliable website reviewgang gave average rating as 6/10 here,5 is mixed and 7 is positive,then what is your opinion now.Dont consider viewers rating as some viewers are blind believers.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 17:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 18 November 2012

Dear

You said in yoyr answer that you only use boxofficeindia for bollywood collections then why you have used entertainment.oneindia.in for Talassh box office colection. Please refer to the following link you have used for Talassh.

http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/box-office/2012/aamir-talaash-7-days-first-week-collection-box-office-101763.html

If you can do so for Talassh you also update Jab Tak Hai Jaan collection to Rs 184.33 Crore for Jab Tak Hai Jaan as well. Please refer to the following link

http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/box-office/2012/jab-tak-hai-jaan-200-cr-collection-worldwide-box-office-101793.html

Update it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.59.135.240 (talk) 14:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Various Websites on Internet showing five days worldwide collection is 106 crores worldwide. Below are some boxoffice sites that are showing worldwide collections. Boxoffice is showing only Indian box office collections not showing worldwide collection. So I have given you few sites that are showing worldwide collection & all showing worldwide collection is 105 crores in 5 days.

<"http://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainmenttags/katrina-kaif/jab-tak-hai-jaan-crosses-100-cr-worldwide-5-days"> <"http://www.koimoi.com/box-office/jab-tak-hai-jaan-crosses-100-crores-at-the-worldwide-box-office/"> <"http://www.boxofficecapsule.com/boxoffice-collections.aspx?id=903"> <"http://boxofficeonline.in/jab-tak-hai-jaan-first-week-collection/"> <"http://boxofficeonline.in/jab-tak-hai-jaan-crossed-100-crores/"

120.56.164.150 (talk) 18:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

There will be definite edit warring and trouble begins if every user show their case with different websites thats why boxofficemojo for hollywood films and boxofficeindia for bollywood films.I hope you got it.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 18:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 19 November 2012

Luckycoolboy94 (talk) 06:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. - you haven't given any details of a proposed edit. Begoon ^talk 06:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

JTHJ enters Top 10 in the USA

JTHJ enters Top 10 in the USA. Please add this info. Source - http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/the-weekend-report-19/ Source - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/bollywood/9690439/Bollywood-film-Jab-Tak-Hai-Jaan-makes-U.S-Top-10.html

 Done Thank you! Vacation^nine 17:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 20 November 2012

YASH CHOPRA’S “JAB TAK HAI JAAN”… A WORLDWIDE BLOCKBUSTER! JAB TAK HAI JAAN COLLECTS 122 CRORES WORLDWIDE IN 6 DAYS ALL INDIA NETT BOX OFFICE COLLECTION

Tuesday 15.23 Cr Wednesday 19.54 Cr Thursday 14.45 Cr Friday 11.17 Cr Saturday 10.38 Cr Sunday 9.96 Cr TOTAL INDIA 80.73 Cr

JAB TAK HAI JAAN COLLECTS 122 CRORES WORLDWIDE IN 6 DAYS

JAB TAK HAI JAAN opened worldwide on Diwali, 13th Nov 2012, to a tremendous response at the box office and has set several collection landmarks ever since.

ALL INDIA NETT BOX OFFICE COLLECTION

Tuesday 15.23 Cr Wednesday 19.54 Cr Thursday 14.45 Cr Friday 11.17 Cr Saturday 10.38 Cr Sunday 9.96 Cr TOTAL INDIA 80.73 Cr

It is the highest first day collection ever for any film released on Laxmi Pooja day, even though it did not have a solo release.

It is also Shahrukh Khan's highest opening day figure, ahead of both RA.One and DON2, which had solo releases.

OVERSEAS

JAB TAK HAI JAAN takes the International Box Office by storm.

JTHJ recorded some mind boggling figures for the opening day (Tuesday) screenings on a limited overseas release, as the film opened in stages over 14th, 15th, and 16th November.

The film has had a tremendous response and the audience reactions have been extremely positive. What has been most touching is that everyone is sitting through the end credits as the film pays a tribute to Yash Chopra, which makes it even more special.

OVERSEAS GROSS BOX OFFICE COLLECTION

Tuesday $1.30 Million Wednesday $1.20 Million Thursday $1.08 Million Friday $1.35 Million Saturday $1.52 Million Sunday $1.13 Million TOTAL $ 7.58 Million TOTAL OVERSEAS 41.7 crores

This is the highest grossing weekend for any Bollywood film overseas! <"http://www.yashrajfilms.com/News/NewsDetails.aspx?NewsID=1d3cf0a4-a473-4513-ae21-2864f6464dd5"> Bharatpandey2007 (talk) 08:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Overseas figures are already added.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 11:35, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Multiple opening records overseas

Source - http://www.indiaglitz.com/channels/hindi/article/88404.html US - Opened at No. 5 on the US Box Office charts and the highest midweek and weekend grossing Bollywood Film ever

UK - Opened at No. 4 on the UK Box Office charts and the highest midweek and weekend grossing Bollywood Film ever .

Middle East - No. 1 at the Box Office and the highest midweek and weekend grossing Bollywood Film ever. The fastest ever in the Middle East for an Indian Film to reach the 2 Million Figure - in 5 days.

Australia - Opened at No. 2 on the Australia Box Office charts (limited release) and the highest opening Bollywood Film ever.

New Zealand - First Bollywood Film to open at No. 1, overtaking all Hollywood Films on Wednesday.

Germany - Opened at No. 7 on the German BO.

Pakistan - All time record of highest Opening Day collections for Film ever.

Singapore - All time record of highest Opening Bollywood Film ever.

Please add this data to the article.

Combined overseas figures are already added,It is difficult to accept variable figures from different websites.There will be only edit warring.We generally prefer Boxofficeindia.com for boxoffice figures.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 17:50, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 27 November 2012

The critics reviews have been mostly positive, not positive to mixed. Simbola16 (talk) 10:48, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

 Not done Many critics have given less stars for the film. Example, Indian Express has given only 2.5 stars, Rediff has criticized the screenplay, and many more. That's why "positive to mixed" is apt. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:36, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 29 November 2012

total worldwide collections: 179.80 cr nett See link to verify request: http://boxofficecapsule.com/boxoffice-collections.aspx 199.64.0.253 (talk) 00:04, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

 Not done. Not a reliable source. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:44, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Jthj box office collection 17 days

Jthj Domestic box office - 116.5 crore Jthj overseas box office - 63.5 crore Jthj worldwide box office - 180 crore

By Analyst Taran Adarsh Written by Suresh Hussain — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.96.75 (talk) 09:04, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

To prove that the top one is real

URL http://buzzcinemas.com/2012/11/29/jab-tak-hai-jaan-17th-day-worldwide-box-office-collection-reports/.html Written by Suresh Hussain — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.96.75 (talk) 09:07, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

17 days box office collection

100 crore in 17 days is fake n I checked in box office India is written something else. This link will show u the exact box office collection from day1 to day 17 here is the link http://m.oneindia.in/entertainment/bollywood/box-office/2012/jab-tak-hai-jaan-2nd-week-17-days-collection-box-office-101582.html This is just the domestic nett This is site is the same as box office India. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.101.118 (talk) 05:20, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 6 December 2012

The film is "hit" not "superhit" according to BoxOfficeIndia.com: http://www.boxofficeindia.com/cpages.php?pageName=earnings

So in the third paragraph it should be " Box Office India declared the film a "hit" in India"

139.190.140.12 (talk) 05:59, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

 Done ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 14:30, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Status

The film has done excellent bussiness in overseas as it is usual for SRK and with a budget of around 50 cr ,finally it reached a figure of 100 cr in domestic market in struggling way.I am just wondering how can YRF and other trade analyst called it a worldwide blockbuster.I do not remove it from article myself because i do not want edit warring.Is yash raj website considered reliable?Please discuss about this issue.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 19:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Of course it is very disappointing at local box office. And what is meant by "other analysts"? It should be "However, according to its production company Yash Raj Films, the film was a "worldwide blockbuster." --139.190.140.12 (talk) 06:19, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Other analysts are Komal Nahta and Taran Adarsh. The figures used in the Yash Raj Films report are theirs if you actually read it. And yes, the two are considered RS according to Wikipedia guidelines. The WW blockbuster and Conflicting reports were added because Box Office India is giving various reports about BO collections. Here they said the film grossed 91 crore in 10 days but in another article they say differently: www.boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5134&nCat. This was discussed with editor Besharamsun, Meryam90, sonataca and another contributor named Jitesh and then added. Based on Wikipedia guidelines, the majority wants this section so it will stay. Thanks for understanding. Ashermadan (talk) 12:08, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

why trust only boi when all trade analyst and sites are saying it crossed 120 cr after its third weekend.what gives boi more credibility?are all these trade analyst(who make a living out of it),yrf,and other trade sites wrong or biased? must go with the majority sites and trade analyst,mention the boi figures in conflicting report and mention majority figures in main report -rahul ghosal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.226.219.9 (talk) 14:27, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Totally agree with the above comment, however want the Conflicting reports section but it should be expanded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trueindiangrit (talk • contribs) 14:32, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

I agree, there should be a section that talks about Conflicting reports because BOI is also flip-flopping over collections. They've never done that before for any other film. I'll expand on the section and include the references above. Thanks! Ashermadan (talk) 14:35, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

BoxOfficeIndia has changed JTHJ collections page at least 3 times (those I have noticed, could be more) which is not the norm with any other movie. BOI looks to be shady because no one seems answerable. All other trade experts have had a similar and constant figures for the collections and were drastically different from BOI's figures. I feel this lack of transparency by BOI should be taken into account and should not be taken as the sole source for movie earnings! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.99.180 (talk) 15:11, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

I agree. BOI data has changed so other sources should be mentioned. Ashermadan (talk) 15:17, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Usually there is a ~5% difference is collections reported by Taran and Komal and Box Office India. Recent examples are Barfi!, even Ek Tha Tiger and Talaash. The biggest difference recorded so far is 8% which occurred during film Bodyguard's collections. For JTHJ this is the first time that BOI changed their data a number of times. The difference in collections reported by BOI and Taran/Komal is roughly 20%. 20% is not in the margin for error. Something these severe should be reported and have a special conflicting reports section. Ashermadan (talk) 15:45, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't know what the heck is going on but I want to stop it, because it is edit warring and the article will come back to full protection. ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 15:52, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Fully protect the page then. Everyone agrees that the article should remain as is and the conflicting reports section is important. But zeeyanketu keeps on creating an edit war. He is the only one who is against it and like 6 people are in favor for it. Please tell him to stop reverting the edits as he has violated the 3 RR rule many times. Ashermadan (talk) 15:56, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Jineshparekh (talk) 16:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)I have a pretty straight opinion. Nett collection of a film reported only by the respective distribution studio should be considered because it the most correct. The reason is simple. The figures reported by the respective distribution studio are subject to statutory audits. The distribution studio reports the nett collection, which is the share it gets from ticket collections at box office, but after deduction of entertainment tax, to media. Hence, any over-reporting results in higher payment of entertainment tax and higher tax deduction at source (TDS). The concurrent statutory auditor of the studio is supposed to publish such over-reporting in his/her audit observation if the corresponding tax liabilities are not adhered to and paid by the distribution studio.

Besides, What is the credibility of Box Office India to question the collection reported by the distributor. Are they even aware of the subsequent tax implication on such over-reporting as they always claim about any film? BOI, except for publishing the collection on its own website, has no credibility whatsoever. For the collection report of BOI to be even considered for debate, one needs to be aware of the mechanism being adopted by BOI to find out collections from theater across India. The collection figures reported by BOI are not subject to any statutory audit. Hence, they can report what they wish to unlike the distribution studio.

in case of Jab Tak Hai Jaan, the film has collected Rs. 1.21 billion at the end of three weeks run, as reported by Yash Raj Films Limited. This is the most correct reporting. The film is a world wide block buster as declared by the offical distribution studio.

Yup, that's why I mentioned it. I'm glad you think the conflicting report section showing other figures that are available is correct. Especially when BOI is providing one figure on one page and another figure on another. The YRF WW blockbuster status has also been included. Thanks. Ashermadan (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Previous figures given by boxofficeindia are estimates and around figure while latter it gave exact territorial breakdown which was exact one.It is an obvious thing and boxofficeindia give figures in more precise manner than any other website that's why it is most reliable among all.And at last you Ashermadan cowardly poisoned others users ears against me.Is that correct as it is not an arena,Do it in civil manner.Why dont you dare to discuss with me or other experienced users.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 17:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

I'm done with this. The edit stays as the majority agrees. Ashermadan (talk) 18:29, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Your english is quite weak too as you have difficulty in reading and understanding.I post some previous links [3],[4], blocked twice here and poisoned others users ears without any valid reasons here, bogus warnings and threats here & here.These are for admin's and other user so they can better decide who is really uncivil.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 18:12, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Alright, enough is enough. Both of you, stop this. ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 18:19, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

The conflicting reports must stay. Just the reason that(and i quote zeeyanketu) "boxofficeindia give figures in more precise manner than any other website that's why it is most reliable among all" is too illogical and naive to be taken seriously. BOI is a privately owned website, with no official stature. So, in case conflicting reports appear, they must be mentioned. I agree with ashermadan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by An0nim0sity (talk • contribs) 19:42, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

The higher a producer quotes his collections, the more tax he/she will have to pay. Therefore no logic would say that a producer or production house exaggerates its earnings!Even BOI states in its About Us section that figures could wary! So are we to believe the producers, or some arbitrary entity whose origins are not even known. Just few mail address's in Contact Us without any registered office, what level of authenticity does it say about the site? I feel BOI should be totally out of reckoning and could very well be deemed an illogical site! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.99.180 (talk) 21:01, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Discussion continued

Following a discussion few years back a consensus was made to use boxofficeindia as a reliable source for boxoffice figures of Bollywood films at wikipedia and we found it in every good article.As far as i have seen it is the only website which give results in algorithmic way although estimated figures are given earlier and exact figures updated latter on.It took time but never failed as usual for any good website and it is obvious that 10 different websites give different figures and then only break the stability of article.What is the need to add conflicting reports as there no need for it as i think.So,I want views of only experience users here so there will be no edit warring regarding this.Thankx---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 19:29, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

The need to have a conflicting reports section arises when there are significant differences in figures reported by other sources like Taran Adarsh and Komal Nahta and Box Office India. The reports by the different sources and Box Office India usually vary only by a small percentage, 5% or less in cases like Ek Tha Tiger and Barfi! and this has been consistent for many years. However, if you look at the Singham page, there is debate whether or not the film crossed 100 crore or did not as Box Office India says it didn't but other sources say it barely did. Jab Tak Hai Jaan is another example where the difference in the figures is too great to ignore. The figures reported by Box Office India and Taran/Komal are 20% apart. This significant difference has caused many people, including myself, to question why the reports can vary this much. 5% or so is understandable but 20% is not. Hence the section was added. Last year, other sources than Box Office India were used for films Ra.One and Don 2 because Box Office India forgot to report the collections of the film in Tamil and Telugu languages and did not provide data for around 200-300 screens in India. Taking all of this into account, including views from "less experienced" editors, the conflicting reports section was added and should remain there. -Ashermadan

While everyone here agrees to keep Box Office India for the Bollywood box office, users like AsherMadan has a history of pushing his agenda on SRK films. Wants to make everything fanboyish. Something like "It will collect more if Yash Raj Films decide to release it in other markets" is barely encyclopedic. Has a long history as we all know. Repeat, the consensus is to keep Box Office India time and again. --139.190.140.12 (talk) 22:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

That comment is from the source. I didn't insert it, your friend or sockpuppet Zeku did. Also, Koimoi is not Komal's website. Why are you making things up? ETC Bollywood is Komal's television channel. -Ashermadan

Are you aware of basic Wikipedia policies like WP:AGF? You accuse established editors of sockpuppetry. You also bite newcomers and label them as trolls and inexperienced. See WP:BITE. Komal just left Koimoi in 2012 and he's been the website's main editor for years. --115.42.65.162 (talk) 13:06, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Very invalid point made by Ashermadan. According to Box Office India, Ek Tha Tiger made 186 crore. According to Komal Nahta it made 198 crore. There is a difference of 12 crore: http://www.koimoi.com/koimoi-bollywood-box-office-top-10-2012-movies/ According to Taran Adarsh's Bollywood Hungama it even made 200 crore: http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movies/features/type/view/id/4005 --139.190.140.12 (talk) 22:18, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

If you take the percentages, it still adds up to around 5-8% difference, not 20%. I have a valid point. And I know your real username is GSK. -Ashermadan

How can you easily said anyone vandal,troll and sockpuppet.That means you dont even know the exact meaning of these.You have a terrible history of edit warring and you were blocked twice too.Only boxofficemojo has been used for Hollywood films as Boxofficeindia for Bollywood.It cannot be changed for you.Not a single experienced user might be agree with you.It will be removed by further discusson.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 03:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

No it won't. The majority of people who have commented agree with me. You are the only one opposing it. You wont even find 10 people who agree with you. And I do believe GSK is your sockpuppet and have lodged a complaint. Keep trying. The majority opinion wins. Ashermadan (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 7 December 2012

I think the sentence below is very inaccurate:

However, Yash Raj Films and independent trade analysts called the film a "worldwide blockbuster."

It only uses one cite that goes to the producers of the film Yash Raj who claims so. It does NOT cite any other sources for "independent trade analysts" who called the film "worldwide blockbuster". And claims from producers isn't even third-party independent data as we all know. It should be changed to:

However, the production company Yash Raj Films claimed that the film was a "worldwide blockbuster."

139.190.140.12 (talk) 22:31, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

This matter is being disputed right now. As it is settled more sources from Komal and Taran will be added. Thanks! Ashermadan (talk) 22:36, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

You couldn't just add uncited claims like that. There's no evidence that "independent trade analysts called the film a worldwide blockbuster". It must be removed now. --139.190.171.30 (talk) 07:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

y not go by boxofficeindia.co.in figure?they r also a ccredible site,boxoffice india changed the collection 3 times ,and their data differs from all the other data given by other sites and trade analysits who more or less agree on their data — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.227.139.144 (talk) 04:59, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

What about Son of Sardaar and singham.Both are in 100-crore club by many sites and reliable sources

What about Son of Sardaar and singham.???? Both are in 100-crore club by many sites and reliable sources.conflicting reports should be here also. See hese links: http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/trade/top5/id/919/date/2012-12-07 http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/trade/top5/id/917/date/2012-11-30 http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-11-30/box-office/35484121_1_crore-mark-ajay-devgn-ffilms-ashwni-dhir http://www.koimoi.com/box-office/son-of-sardaar-beats-bol-bachchan-grabs-7th-position-in-koimoi-top-10-india-box-office-2012/ http://movies.ndtv.com/movie_story.aspx?Section=Movies&ID=299099&subcatg=&keyword=bollywood&nid=299099 http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/movies/son-of-sardar-crosses-rs-100-crore-mark-in-india_123621.htm http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/son-of-sardaar-enters-100-crore-club/1/235423.html

Many sources such Taran Adarsh ,Times of India,Bollywood Hungama, Zee news,NDTV,Koimoi, etc. have stated that Son of Sardaar crossed 100 crore (US$18.2 million) nett.gross in India in 16 days.But Box Office India has stated only 88 cr(original 105 cr) for Son of Sardaar and 102 crore(origibal 120 cr) for Jab Tak Hai Jaan,after 3 weeks run in India.See this link: http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5178&nCat= Also BOI downgraded the verdict on JTHJ in india from "superhit" to hit" see this link: http://boxofficeindia.com/boxdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5136&nCat= and then it removed this page content. No trade magazine or website except Box Office India is giving wrong estimates early on,and deleting that page content. Please add conflicitng reports section on Son of sardaar and singham.Even for Barfi ,BOI has given only 106 cr(original its 120 cr )

I rember this Eid Day,on August 20,2012, Just n the evening when Taran Adarsh tweeted 100 cr nett. for Ek tha Tiger in 5 days,all New channels like Aaj Tak,Zee News,CNN-IBN and trade magazines statrted giving news of 100 cr for ETT from 4 pm in evening,while BOI has stated it crossed in 6 days. The difference in BOI and other sources(all these give same figures) is now growing from 5 cr to 13 cr and now its 18 cr fro JTHJ and SOS. Abhinavname (talk) 06:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)