User talk:Snowded: Difference between revisions
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
== hello == |
== hello == |
||
Hello Snowded, could you please observe and follow this when editing please. Much appreciated. [[Wikipedia:COI|WP:COI]]. [[User:Enemesis|Enemesis]] ([[User talk:Enemesis|talk]]) 17:28, 11 December 2012 (UTC) |
Hello Snowded, could you please observe and follow this when editing please. Also can you please change the NLP article edits so that it is NPOV. Much appreciated. [[Wikipedia:COI|WP:COI]]. [[User:Enemesis|Enemesis]] ([[User talk:Enemesis|talk]]) 17:28, 11 December 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:39, 11 December 2012
Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:
- Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
- If I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
- Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
- Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
- To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
- You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).
- Archive to 29 May 08
- Archive to 21 July 08
- Archive to 30 Nov 08
- Archive to 03 Mar 09
- Archive to 18 Oct 09
- User talk:Snowded/Autoarchive 16
- User talk:Snowded/Autoarchive 23 latest
The Signpost: 12 November 2012
- News and notes: Court ruling complicates the paid-editing debate
- Featured content: The table has turned
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20 and the prospects for getting 1.21 code reviewed promptly
- WikiProject report: Land of parrots, palm trees, and the Holy Cross: WikiProject Brazil
WSC at ANI (again)
It seems this is mostly about his edits to the psychotherapies, although his edits at Eysenck were brought up too. Seeing that you are active on that page, you should probably comment on the former. Thread is here. Tijfo098 (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 November 2012
- News and notes: FDC's financial muscle kicks in
- WikiProject report: No teenagers, mutants, or ninjas: WikiProject Turtles
- Technology report: Structural reorganisation "not a done deal"
- Featured content: Wikipedia hit by the Streisand effect
- Discussion report: GOOG, MSFT, WMT: the ticker symbol placement question
comment on WP:FRINGE guidelines
Hi Snowded, I think that it is possible to improve the articles related to NLP. I would suggest that you read closely the WP:FRINGE guidelines. Do you think that it applies to writing an article on NLP? I'm trying to find fertile ground in editors can work collaboratively. -Reconsolidation (talk) 09:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Own up to your previous identities and we might be able to ----Snowded TALK 09:13, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the referral to Sandy Pentland. I'm really into that sort of thing. That is the way that social communications should be researched. I watched a couple of his lectures and interviews on youtube. --Reconsolidation (talk) 09:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 November 2012
- News and notes: Toolserver finance remains uncertain
- Recent research: Movie success predictions, readability, credentials and authority, geographical comparisons
- Featured content: Panoramic views, history, and a celestial constellation
- Technology report: Wikidata reaches 100,000 entries
- WikiProject report: Directing Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting
The Signpost: 03 December 2012
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments announces 2012 winner
- Featured content: The play's the thing
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; standardize version history tables
- Technology report: MediaWiki problems but good news for Toolserver stability
- WikiProject report: The White Rose: WikiProject Yorkshire
GF6 removal on the Lancaster University article
When editing out a section, you should probably place a comment on the talk page. Major changes to articles like that are not so easily done, especially when it is effectively removing the only controversial information on the article, without discussion. I have re-instated. If you wish to remove it, discuss why.
Note that the non-inclusion or mis-categorisation of information are not valid reasons to remove other information. They would be reasons to add more information and re-title it to another section. Thanks 86.184.10.58 (talk) 20:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- A one time IP giving lectures? Read WP:BRD ----Snowded TALK 22:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
hello
Hello Snowded, could you please observe and follow this when editing please. Also can you please change the NLP article edits so that it is NPOV. Much appreciated. WP:COI. Enemesis (talk) 17:28, 11 December 2012 (UTC)