Jump to content

User talk:Snowded: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Enemesis (talk | contribs)
Enemesis (talk | contribs)
Line 96: Line 96:
== hello ==
== hello ==


Hello Snowded, could you please observe and follow this when editing please. Much appreciated. [[Wikipedia:COI|WP:COI]]. [[User:Enemesis|Enemesis]] ([[User talk:Enemesis|talk]]) 17:28, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Snowded, could you please observe and follow this when editing please. Also can you please change the NLP article edits so that it is NPOV. Much appreciated. [[Wikipedia:COI|WP:COI]]. [[User:Enemesis|Enemesis]] ([[User talk:Enemesis|talk]]) 17:28, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:39, 11 December 2012

Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

  • Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
    • If I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
  • Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
    • Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
    • Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
  • To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
  • You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

WSC at ANI (again)

It seems this is mostly about his edits to the psychotherapies, although his edits at Eysenck were brought up too. Seeing that you are active on that page, you should probably comment on the former. Thread is here. Tijfo098 (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

comment on WP:FRINGE guidelines

Hi Snowded, I think that it is possible to improve the articles related to NLP. I would suggest that you read closely the WP:FRINGE guidelines. Do you think that it applies to writing an article on NLP? I'm trying to find fertile ground in editors can work collaboratively. -Reconsolidation (talk) 09:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Own up to your previous identities and we might be able to ----Snowded TALK 09:13, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the referral to Sandy Pentland. I'm really into that sort of thing. That is the way that social communications should be researched. I watched a couple of his lectures and interviews on youtube. --Reconsolidation (talk) 09:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

GF6 removal on the Lancaster University article

When editing out a section, you should probably place a comment on the talk page. Major changes to articles like that are not so easily done, especially when it is effectively removing the only controversial information on the article, without discussion. I have re-instated. If you wish to remove it, discuss why.

Note that the non-inclusion or mis-categorisation of information are not valid reasons to remove other information. They would be reasons to add more information and re-title it to another section. Thanks 86.184.10.58 (talk) 20:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A one time IP giving lectures? Read WP:BRD ----Snowded TALK 22:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Hello Snowded, could you please observe and follow this when editing please. Also can you please change the NLP article edits so that it is NPOV. Much appreciated. WP:COI. Enemesis (talk) 17:28, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]