Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reverend and The Makers: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:28, 12 May 2006

Reverend and The Makers

Undeleted after a DRV discussion, but many called for relisting this. Unsure about notability here so no vote. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Easily passes WP:MUSIC by virtue of their current national tour dates supporting the UK arm of the Arctic Monkeys' tour, after which they perform more dates in their own right. --Tony Sidaway 06:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep pursuant to arguements made in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Reverend and The Makers by Captmonkey, who reasonably demonstrated it meets WP:MUSIC. And thanks to Sjakkalle for the doing the undeletion. --Rob 07:12, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It all comes down to whether touring as support band is enough to satisfy WP:MUSIC. I'm not sure what the precedent is so no vote at the moment, but my personal feeling is that as this band are unsigned (or were when I last checked), they weren't the headliners on the tour, they are not yet sufficiently notable. --kingboyk 10:58, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Tony Sidaway and Thivierr. DarthVad e r 12:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Though I'm not sure that touring as a support act satisfies WP:MUSIC, since it's a fairly notable tour with a large audience, I'd say it does push them over the bar. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as they have another tour soon and the love will spread further. I know ive searched on here for them before only to be disappointed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.68.66.122 (talk • contribs) .
Keep per above. Support bands surely meet the touring requirement of WP:MUSIC. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 23:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not only have they played support on a very notable and high profile UK tour, but have braced the pages of magazines such as NME and Sandman, recieve airplay on major slots on Radio 1 and judging by their rate of success so far, will bring many more reasons to keep this page in coming months. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.107.163.124 (talk • contribs) .
Keep My argument is well documented on the Deletion Appeal log page. :) Definately meets WP:MUSIC. Captmonkey 14:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in agreement with reasons cited on the deletion appeal, esp. tour support, mentions in NME and airplay on Radio 1 craigand
Keep -- whoever deleted the page should have checked for evidence of notability themselves; the band have sufficient media profile in the UK for notability to have been assumed. 212.56.68.42 15:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *'''Keep''' My argument is well documented on the Deletion Appeal log page. :) Definately meets WP:MUSIC. [[User:Captmonkey|Captmonkey]] 14:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC) <!-- [Template:Unsigned] -->
 *'''Keep''' in agreement with reasons cited on the deletion appeal, esp. tour support, mentions in NME and airplay on Radio 1 [[User:Craigand|craigand]]
+* '''Keep''' -- whoever deleted the page should have checked for evidence of notability themselves; the band have sufficient media profile in the UK for notability to have been assumed. [[User:212.56.68.42|212.56.68.42]] 15:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)