Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aden Services: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Tom Morris (talk | contribs) Relisting debate |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} |
||
:{{la|Aden Services}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aden Services|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December |
:{{la|Aden Services}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aden Services|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 17#{{anchorencode:Aden Services}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
||
:({{Find sources|Aden Services}}) |
:({{Find sources|Aden Services}}) |
||
Article is about a food services complany from China. Notability anyone?–[[User:BuickCenturyDriver|BuickCentury]][[User talk:BuickCenturyDriver|Driver]] 06:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC) |
Article is about a food services complany from China. Notability anyone?–[[User:BuickCenturyDriver|BuickCentury]][[User talk:BuickCenturyDriver|Driver]] 06:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
*'''Weak keep.''' 13000 employees seems big enough to be notable. But current article does not establish notability (eg a news story because they did X, or they are the Yth biggest food services company in the world) [[User:1292simon|1292simon]] ([[User talk:1292simon|talk]]) 01:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Weak keep.''' 13000 employees seems big enough to be notable. But current article does not establish notability (eg a news story because they did X, or they are the Yth biggest food services company in the world) [[User:1292simon|1292simon]] ([[User talk:1292simon|talk]]) 01:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
|||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> |
|||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 23:29, 17 December 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
|||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
Revision as of 23:29, 17 December 2012
- Aden Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is about a food services complany from China. Notability anyone?–BuickCenturyDriver 06:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable.Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:33, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep The scale of the company is notable, as is the number and type of war-zone and emerging-market locations where it operates. In business 13+ years, 13000 employees, $60 million in sales, how can it not be notable? Not much English-language coverage, but covered in languages of countries where it operates, in trade directories, and also in the top French newspaper even though not France-based (http://www.lefigaro.fr/lefigaromagazine/2010/02/13/01006-20100213ARTFIG00085--joachim-p-oy-lo-39-ans-president-et-fondateur-d-aden-services-.php) and in two highly reputable business magazines (http://www.usinenouvelle.com/article/joachim-poylo-sert-ses-repas-au-bout-du-monde.N63314 and http://lentreprise.lexpress.fr/implantation-a-l-etranger/ils-font-du-business-en-chine-six-exemples-de-reussite_23361.html). Continues to receive investments (http://archives.lesechos.fr/archives/2011/LesEchos/21000-54-ECH.htm). Meets WP:CORPDEPTH easily. Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 13:55, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:13, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:13, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- Weak keep. 13000 employees seems big enough to be notable. But current article does not establish notability (eg a news story because they did X, or they are the Yth biggest food services company in the world) 1292simon (talk) 01:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 23:29, 17 December 2012 (UTC)