Jump to content

Talk:Animal model of schizophrenia/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
comment
→GA Review: review finished
Line 9: Line 9:


#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check|}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check|aye}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|aye}}
#::
#::
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|}} b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|aye}} b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|aye}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|aye}}
#::
#::
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|}} b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|aye}} b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|aye}}
#::
#::
#It follows the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
#It follows the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|aye}}
#::
#::
#It is '''stable'''.
#It is '''stable'''.
Line 27: Line 27:
#:: Main picture's source is dead
#:: Main picture's source is dead
#'''Overall''':
#'''Overall''':
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|hold}}
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->
*'''Note:''' Hi Tomcat, and thanks for reviewing the article. Just to let you know that I won't be available to respond to your comments for about a week due to university exams this week and next. If you decide to put the review on hold to allow issues to be resolved, I hope you don't mind if it takes longer than expected to complete the review. I will be back actively editing on the 18th of December, and I may do some editing in between if I have time. Thank's again, [[User:Quasihuman|Quasihuman]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Quasihuman|talk]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Quasihuman|contribs]]) 15:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
*'''Note:''' Hi Tomcat, and thanks for reviewing the article. Just to let you know that I won't be available to respond to your comments for about a week due to university exams this week and next. If you decide to put the review on hold to allow issues to be resolved, I hope you don't mind if it takes longer than expected to complete the review. I will be back actively editing on the 18th of December, and I may do some editing in between if I have time. Thank's again, [[User:Quasihuman|Quasihuman]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Quasihuman|talk]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Quasihuman|contribs]]) 15:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
:Sorry for the delay.

----
*", this comes from the discovery of increased L-DOPA decarboxylase levels in the brains of these patients." - you can not split main clauses by placing a comma; either convert it to a semicolon, or reword.
*Are only rats and mices used? If yes, why exactly.
*The language is tough but I guess it is ok for medicine articles. --[[User:Tomcat7|Tomcat]] '''''([[User talk:Tomcat7|7]])''''' 16:13, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:13, 19 December 2012

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 15:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Main picture's source is dead
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • Note: Hi Tomcat, and thanks for reviewing the article. Just to let you know that I won't be available to respond to your comments for about a week due to university exams this week and next. If you decide to put the review on hold to allow issues to be resolved, I hope you don't mind if it takes longer than expected to complete the review. I will be back actively editing on the 18th of December, and I may do some editing in between if I have time. Thank's again, Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 15:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delay.
  • ", this comes from the discovery of increased L-DOPA decarboxylase levels in the brains of these patients." - you can not split main clauses by placing a comma; either convert it to a semicolon, or reword.
  • Are only rats and mices used? If yes, why exactly.
  • The language is tough but I guess it is ok for medicine articles. --Tomcat (7) 16:13, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Animal_model_of_schizophrenia/GA1&oldid=528817458"