Talk:Communicative rationality: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:56, 21 December 2012

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Start‑class

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Philosophy: Social and political Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Is this the same thing as theory of communicative reason?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 21:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but I'm guessing yes. Lucidish 21:42, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Independent of the merit of the article itself, (Cooke, 1994) is cited twice but no reference is given. 141.212.109.98 (talk) 19:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cooke 1994 seems to refer to Maeve Cooke's Language and Reason: A Study in Habermas's Pragmatics. I have added this to the bibliography. Veracon.net (talk) 14:56, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 09:10, 20 November 2011 edit DodoBot (talk \| contribs) 136,137 edits m Bot: Working for WP:ALTF; Inheriting Start-class assessment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:56, 21 December 2012 edit undo Veracon.net (talk \| contribs) 83 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Independent of the merit of the article itself, (Cooke, 1994) is cited twice but no reference is given. [[Special:Contributions/141.212.109.98\|141.212.109.98]] ([[User talk:141.212.109.98\|talk]]) 19:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)		Independent of the merit of the article itself, (Cooke, 1994) is cited twice but no reference is given. [[Special:Contributions/141.212.109.98\|141.212.109.98]] ([[User talk:141.212.109.98\|talk]]) 19:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
			: Cooke 1994 seems to refer to Maeve Cooke's ''Language and Reason: A Study in Habermas's Pragmatics''. I have added this to the bibliography. [[User:Veracon.net\|Veracon.net]] ([[User talk:Veracon.net\|talk]]) 14:56, 21 December 2012 (UTC)