Talk:Alternatives to the Ten Commandments: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:28, 31 December 2012

Philosophy: Ethics / Religion Start‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Philosophy of religion

Bible Unassessed Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Selig Starr was copied or moved into Ten Commandment alternatives with this edit on Dec/31/12. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Untitled

No mention of the Three Laws of Robotics which seems to have expanded to 6 or so laws, that more or less work for humans?

Ted Kazinsky (sic)? Really?

Do we really need to include a section on the code of conduct of a terrorist & serial killer? Don't his actions invalidate his standing as a person entitled to discuss ethical social behavior? Wouldn't it be better to just ignore such a person? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.47.171 (talk) 17:37, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kaczynski's own article mentions that a number of his fellow anarcho-primitivists have actually defended him and his manifesto, if not his actions. So despite being a terrorist, his ideology has been influential among some. Consider that we also have an article about the Ladenese epistles, which were also written by a (far more notorious) terrorist. LonelyBoy2012 (talk) 20:01, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{philosophy|importance=mid|class=Start|ethics=yes|religion=yes}}
 {{WikiProject Bible|class=|importance=low}}
+{{Copied|from=Selig Starr|from_oldid=530665423|to=Ten Commandment alternatives|diff=http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Ten_Commandment_alternatives&diff=530665851&oldid=530064510|date=Dec/31/12}}
 ==Untitled==