Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Serial sockpuppeteer is back |
Declining checkuser, marking case as closed |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|TungstenCarbide}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|TungstenCarbide}} |
||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|close}} |
||
=====<big>4 January 2013</big>===== |
=====<big>4 January 2013</big>===== |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
*{{Decline}} - No checkuser needed for blatant socks like this one, which I have blocked. Closing. [[User:Reaper Eternal|Reaper Eternal]] ([[User talk:Reaper Eternal|talk]]) 15:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 15:49, 4 January 2013
TungstenCarbide
TungstenCarbide (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide/Archive.
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
4 January 2013
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Volframkarbiid (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
This one is really obvious. The username is a barely disguised version of TungstenCarbide (Volfram/Wolfram is the German name for tungsten). Used to make a hit-and-run personal attack on Jimbo Wales' user talk page. Prioryman (talk) 15:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Clerk declined - No checkuser needed for blatant socks like this one, which I have blocked. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC)