User talk:Syncmaster941bw

Welcome!

Hello, Syncmaster941bw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as '''The Certified Health and Safety Consultant''', may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! §everal⇒|Times 15:12, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Copyright violation

Your new page Certified Health and Safety Consultant(CHSC) looks as if it is a copyright violation of http://www.csse.org/chsc_designation. I suggest that you reword it into your own words very quickly, or else it is likely to be speedily deleted. - David Biddulph (talk) 18:21, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Certified Health and Safety Consultant

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Certified Health and Safety Consultant, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from www.csse.org/chsc_designation. As a copyright violation, Certified Health and Safety Consultant appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Certified Health and Safety Consultant has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Certified Health and Safety Consultant and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Certified Health and Safety Consultant with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Certified Health and Safety Consultant.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

The same copyright violation applied to the section Certified Health and Safety Consultant (CHSC) in the article Canadian Society of Safety Engineering, so that too has been deleted.

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. - David Biddulph (talk) 05:07, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Canadian Society of Safety Engineering with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 01:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

On a number of occasions you have tried to use inline external links in an article. This insn't the way Wikipedia works, so please read WP:EL. In general those inline external links should be changed to references, see WP:Referencing for beginners. - David Biddulph (talk) 04:54, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

I have moved some of the disconnected things that were presumably intended to be references, and put them with the text to which they were presumably intended to apply as references. Please take the trouble to read WP:Referencing for beginners so that you will understand how to do it correctly in future. - David Biddulph (talk) 04:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

January 2013

Hello, I'm RedSoxFan2434. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Theresa Spence, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RedSoxFan2434 (talk) 01:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Theresa Spence, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RedSoxFan2434 (talk) 03:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Theresa Spence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You need to get consensus on the talk page for this now. Dougweller (talk) 09:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

I do not agree with the above warning from Dougweller and believe he has made an error in issuing the warning--Syncmaster941bw (talk) 23:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Syncmaster941bw. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 21:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dougweller (talk) 21:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

"It should be noted"

We try not to tell our readers that something is particularly important -- see WP:EDITORIALIZING. This is in no way a warning, this is my just telling you something you may not know. Dougweller (talk) 21:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Understood--Syncmaster941bw (talk) 22:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)