Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dieter Fensel: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 86.32.221.170 - "Dieter Fensel: "
Line 11: Line 11:
*'''Delete''' - while he appears to be a prolific writer of published books I can't find anything about him beyond his university bios. I certainly don't see multiple independent sources. <font color="#454545">[[User:James086|James086]]</font><sup>[[User talk:James086|<font color="#006400">Talk</font>]]</sup> 15:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - while he appears to be a prolific writer of published books I can't find anything about him beyond his university bios. I certainly don't see multiple independent sources. <font color="#454545">[[User:James086|James086]]</font><sup>[[User talk:James086|<font color="#006400">Talk</font>]]</sup> 15:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. [[Google scholar]] gives over 20 papers with over 100 cites, a few with over 1000 cites. I lost count. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 22:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC).
*'''Keep'''. [[Google scholar]] gives over 20 papers with over 100 cites, a few with over 1000 cites. I lost count. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 22:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC).
**'''Comment''' How many of these 20 publications are really his own papers (his name comes on the first position), and how many are just joined work of several researchers or even only edited books, where sometimes tenths of authors could contribute? How many of these papers are papers of PhD students, where traditionally the name of the supervising professor is added to the list of authors? Is this number of citation significant if comparing it to other professors of computer science?
**'''Comment''' How many of these 20 publications are really his own papers (his name comes on the first position), and how many are just joined work of several researchers or even only edited books, where sometimes tenths of authors could contribute? How many of these papers are papers of PhD students, where traditionally the name of the supervising professor is added to the list of authors? Is this number of citation significant if comparing it to other professors of computer science? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.32.221.170|86.32.221.170]] ([[User talk:86.32.221.170|talk]]) 23:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 23:26, 12 January 2013

Dieter Fensel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominate for deletion Has been tagged as of uncertain notability for over 5 years. I could find nothing to confirm notability. Boleyn (talk) 09:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - while he appears to be a prolific writer of published books I can't find anything about him beyond his university bios. I certainly don't see multiple independent sources. James086Talk 15:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Google scholar gives over 20 papers with over 100 cites, a few with over 1000 cites. I lost count. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]
    • Comment How many of these 20 publications are really his own papers (his name comes on the first position), and how many are just joined work of several researchers or even only edited books, where sometimes tenths of authors could contribute? How many of these papers are papers of PhD students, where traditionally the name of the supervising professor is added to the list of authors? Is this number of citation significant if comparing it to other professors of computer science? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.32.221.170 (talk) 23:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]