Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dieter Fensel: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 01:19, 13 January 2013

Dieter Fensel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominate for deletion Has been tagged as of uncertain notability for over 5 years. I could find nothing to confirm notability. Boleyn (talk) 09:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 09:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - while he appears to be a prolific writer of published books I can't find anything about him beyond his university bios. I certainly don't see multiple independent sources. James086^Talk 15:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Google scholar gives over 20 papers with over 100 cites, a few with over 1000 cites. I lost count. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Comment How many of these 20 publications are really his own papers (his name comes on the first position), and how many are just joined work of several researchers or even only edited books, where sometimes tenths of authors could contribute? How many of these papers are papers of PhD students, where traditionally the name of the supervising professor is added to the list of authors? Is this number of citation significant if comparing it to other professors of computer science? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.32.221.170 (talk) 23:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]

@anon spa: Perhaps you would like to answer these questions yourself to help other editors. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *'''Keep'''. [[Google scholar]] gives over 20 papers with over 100 cites, a few with over 1000 cites. I lost count. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 22:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC).
 **'''Comment''' How many of these 20 publications are really his own papers (his name comes on the first position), and how many are just joined work of several researchers or even only edited books, where sometimes tenths of authors could contribute? How many of these papers are papers of PhD students, where traditionally the name of the supervising professor is added to the list of authors? Is this number of citation significant if comparing it to other professors of computer science?  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.32.221.170|86.32.221.170]] ([[User talk:86.32.221.170|talk]]) 23:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->{{spa|86.32.221.170}}
-:::@anon spa: Perhaps you would like to answer this question yourself. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 00:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC).
+:::@anon spa: Perhaps you would like to answer these questions yourself to help other editors. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 00:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC).