Talk:Cumbernauld: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
TheGrappler (talk | contribs) {{reqphotoin|Scotland}} |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{reqphotoin|Scotland}} |
|||
==Photos== |
==Photos== |
||
Revision as of 16:16, 15 May 2006
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Photos
Any chance of some photos - would be good to see what it looks like... Justinc 12:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC) trust me you don't... Jamie-planetx 18:05, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
It really isn't that bad, it's hardly a horror story. Fraslet 18:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
it's a coincidence you should say that im researching cumbernaulds history for ghost storys hexes and such superstition for a concert production, mainly from the romain times and possible curses on cumbernauld any help about such things would be apreciated send me an email Jamie@planetxfilms.co.uk if you have any material. it's true i admire the architachture of cumbernauld i thing the town centre idea was and still is way ahead of it's time, i even admire the residantial areas of pathways not interveining with roads, i think they went wrong with building what is called PHASE 4 (where tesco used to be),Jamie-planetx 23:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
This article has gradually decended into POV and conjecture in favour of the town's planning. There are aspects of the town I like, but this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a forum to drum up civic pride for one's town. There are serious criticisms of the town's planning and its fabric: that should be reflected. Could definitely do with a clean-up. FrFintonStack 21:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)