Fisher transformation: Difference between revisions
changed artanh to arctanh |
Undid revision 534460716 by 203.148.162.128 (talk) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The transformation is defined by: |
The transformation is defined by: |
||
:<math>z = {1 \over 2}\ln\left({1+r \over 1-r}\right) = \operatorname{ |
:<math>z = {1 \over 2}\ln\left({1+r \over 1-r}\right) = \operatorname{artanh}(r),</math> |
||
where "ln" is the [[natural logarithm]] function and " |
where "ln" is the [[natural logarithm]] function and "artanh" is the [[inverse hyperbolic function]]. |
||
If (''X'', ''Y'') has a [[bivariate normal distribution]], and if the (''X''<sub>''i''</sub>, ''Y''<sub>''i''</sub>) pairs used to form ''r'' are independent for ''i'' = 1, ..., ''n'', then ''z'' is approximately [[normal distribution|normally distributed]] with mean |
If (''X'', ''Y'') has a [[bivariate normal distribution]], and if the (''X''<sub>''i''</sub>, ''Y''<sub>''i''</sub>) pairs used to form ''r'' are independent for ''i'' = 1, ..., ''n'', then ''z'' is approximately [[normal distribution|normally distributed]] with mean |
Revision as of 08:35, 23 January 2013
In statistics, hypotheses about the value of the population correlation coefficient ρ between variables X and Y can be tested using the Fisher transformation [1][2] applied to the sample correlation coefficient r.
Definition
The transformation is defined by:
where "ln" is the natural logarithm function and "artanh" is the inverse hyperbolic function.
If (X, Y) has a bivariate normal distribution, and if the (Xi, Yi) pairs used to form r are independent for i = 1, ..., n, then z is approximately normally distributed with mean
and standard error
where N is the sample size.
This transformation, and its inverse,
can be used to construct a confidence interval for ρ.
Discussion
The Fisher transformation is an approximate variance-stabilizing transformation for r when X and Y follow a bivariate normal distribution. This means that the variance of z is approximately constant for all values of the population correlation coefficient ρ. Without the Fisher transformation, the variance of r grows smaller as |ρ| gets closer to 1. Since the Fisher transformation is approximately the identity function when |r| < 1/2, it is sometimes useful to remember that the variance of r is well approximated by 1/N as long as |ρ| is not too large and N is not too small. This is related to the fact that the asymptotic variance of r is 1 for bivariate normal data.
The behavior of this transform has been extensively studied since Fisher introduced it in 1915. Fisher himself found the exact distribution of z for data from a bivariate normal distribution in 1921; Gayen, 1951[3] determined the exact distribution of z for data from a bivariate Type A Edgeworth distribution. Hotelling in 1953 calculated the Taylor series expressions for the moments of z and several related statistics[4] and Hawkins in 1989 discovered the asymptotic distribution of z for virtually any data.[5]
Other uses
While the Fisher transformation is mainly associated with the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient for bivariate normal observations, it can also be applied to Spearman's rank correlation coefficient in more general cases. A similar result for the asymptotic distribution applies, but with a minor adjustment factor: see the latter article for details.
References
- ^ Fisher, R.A. (1915). "Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples of an indefinitely large population". Biometrika. 10 (4). Biometrika Trust: 507–521. JSTOR 2331838.
- ^ Fisher, R.A. (1921). "On the `probable error' of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample" (PDF). Metron. 1: 3–32.
- ^ Gayen, A.K. (1951). "The Frequency Distribution of the Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient in Random Samples of Any Size Drawn from Non-Normal Universes". Biometrika. 38 (1/2). Biometrika Trust: 219–247. JSTOR 2332329.
- ^ Hotelling, H (1953). "New light on the correlation coefficient and its transforms". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B. 15 (2). Blackwell Publishing: 193–225. JSTOR 2983768.
- ^ Hawkins, D.L. (1989). "Using U statistics to derive the asymptotic distribution of Fisher's Z statistic". The American Statistician. 43 (4). American Statistical Association: 235–237. doi:10.2307/2685369. JSTOR 2685369.