User talk:86.157.171.34: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Wtshymanski (talk | contribs) Suggestions needed |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Push pull== |
==Push pull== |
||
How would you like to see <blockquote> The push-pull technique was widely adopted in vacuum tube amplifiers.</blockquote> re-written? --[[User:Wtshymanski|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski|talk]]) 20:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC) |
How would you like to see <blockquote> The push-pull technique was widely adopted in vacuum tube amplifiers.</blockquote> re-written? --[[User:Wtshymanski|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski|talk]]) 20:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
:The clue is in the numerous edit summaries. But for the benefit of the hard of thinking: it needs to be written in a way that does not imply that it's use was not widely adopted elsewhere. [[Special:Contributions/86.157.171.34|86.157.171.34]] ([[User talk:86.157.171.34#top|talk]]) 09:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:24, 24 January 2013
Your edit to Lithium-ion battery
Thank you. Jeh (talk) 21:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- My pleasure! 86.157.171.34 (talk) 11:54, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Push pull
How would you like to see
The push-pull technique was widely adopted in vacuum tube amplifiers.
re-written? --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- The clue is in the numerous edit summaries. But for the benefit of the hard of thinking: it needs to be written in a way that does not imply that it's use was not widely adopted elsewhere. 86.157.171.34 (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)