Talk:Deep Space Industries: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:09, 24 January 2013

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Location?

Does anyone know the actual location of Deep Space Industries? It may be that they don't have one, of course; it is now possible to run a completely decentralized company -- at least until you have a factory -- but I would imagine that they must have a mailing address, even if it is just a PO box. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:06, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The press conference said they would have a presence in the Washington DC area (David Gump) with no shop space, and that the shop space and development lab location was not yet selected, but Houston, Texas or some part of California (LA area or bay area, I don't recall) were the leading candidates for their satellite develop/build/test/facility. Cheers. N2e (talk) 13:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

space and asteroid "ownership", "taking", "claiming"

seems the UN already has some treaties about outer space. the true property interests of this space business, if any, are not clear.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 == space and asteroid "ownership", "taking", "claiming" ==
-seems the UN already has some treaties about outer space. the true property interests of this space business, if any, are not clear. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User: 75.84.95.229 | 75.84.95.229 ]] ([[User talk: 75.84.95.229 |talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ 75.84.95.229 |contribs]])   01:38, 24 January 2013‎  (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
+seems the UN already has some treaties about outer space. the true property interests of this space business, if any, are not clear.
-:Nor is it clear whether the UN has jurisdiction. See '''[[Space law#The future of space law]]''' and '''[[Metalaw]]'''. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 02:09, 24 January 2013 (UTC)