User talk:Theresa knott/archive15: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:29, 16 May 2006

archive 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Welcome to my talk page. If you've come to complain, whine, moan, question my judgment, my intelligence, my sanity, or tell me off in any way, that's fine. I'm a big girl who can take it. If you've come to chat, compliment me, have a laugh, or discuss articles that's even better.

User talk:JaysCyYoung

He removed warnings which is vandalizm. Ardenn 00:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't talk bollocks! And stop playing games. look at your own behaviour here. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 00:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page is becoming very long. Please consider archiving. Ardenn 00:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK 00:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

This is just a quick notice to thank you for freezing edit of my page. This is said with no trace of sarcasm and I am genuinely thankful that you prevented further vandalism of it. The thing that upsets me, and I'm not trying to be disruptive (as I am a long-time contributor on Wikipedia), is that the user Ardenn is merely removing information from the Queen's University page without group discussion or consensus. He also ignored three sources or citations that I had provided to validate the veracity and notability of the information that myself and others had written on the page. It seems that he/she may be an administrator and, seeing as you appear to be one Theresa, I would like to express my disappointment at the behaviour of an individual in charge acting in such a manner.

Is there anything that I can do in order to reach an agreement? I have tried to be civil and, while I am upset at the changes Ardenn has made, his one-liners and refusal to co-operate (or even ENGAGE in any meaningful and productive discussion) have merely further incensed myself. Please help if you can. It feels like I have tried everything but I'm not sure why he/she is acting in this manner. Thank you very much once again!

Warmest regards, Jameson.

JaysCyYoung 00:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations and plenty of them. I'd be very surprised if he were an admin let me look into that. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 00:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No he is not an admin. my advice to you is 1) take a break. The article will still be there tomorrow or next week or next month even, Edit it then. 2) Never edit when upset and 3) go through our formal disput resolution methods if all else fails. A Wikipedia:request for comments will generate a wider community view on the matter. BTW I have to unprotect you talk page in the morning so that people can talk to you. If i forget please remind me.Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 00:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual harassment article

Thanks for your help. Aine63 and his/her sockpuppets have reverted three times in the past couple of hours, prior to your intervention. You might want to take some action about this if you haven't already. I'll also put a note on the notice board in case you don't want to get involved with blocks. I am unwilling to block this user myself, as I feel I have too much of a conflict of interest. Metamagician3000 02:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking that there was already a breach of 3RR, but technically it will take another revert by Aine63 before that happens. Metamagician3000 02:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a lot more to this than Meta is telling you. I myself have put in a notice to the admins about the deletions in the article today. I'll be surprised if this situation is viewed as a simple 3rr considering Meta's history at Wikipedia. He has been vandalising the Sexual harassment article for months, continually deleting and rewriting useful information--all of it factual and backed up with references--and trying to rewrite the article to fit his own personal point of view. When called on his behavior and informed of the rules regarding vandalism, he scoffed, and resorted to personal attacks. I've reported him several times. Contributions to the page are welcome (I've been an active contributor to this and other articles for over a year now) but not at the expense of the contributions of others if they contain factual information or are backed up with references.

BTW: I've never intentionally tried to use a "sockpuppet" revert. I don't always log in when I edit, but there has never been any hidden motive in doing that. Frankly, I didn't even know about a 3rr and that this was a way to get around it. Aine63 03:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm prepared to believe that this person is naive rather than malicious, but you can see the difficulty. There has been a fourth revert, btw. Metamagician3000 04:46, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting Meta since you seem to always have been only malicious from the beginning.

Teresa, the references have not been removed, they remain. Aine63 05:04, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No they don't look further down the page, you removed two. Also you failed to provide references for your text. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 05:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply, Theresa. Meta added some different citations so that matter is now closed. I feel I must let you know that the deleted information, the one that is still in need of citations, is NOT my information. This was added by someone else many, many weeks ago. (I reverted it because of Meta's habit of deleting info he simply doesn't like, even if it is factual and/or backed up with references--this has been the main problem from the beginning.) Controversial articles like the Sexual harassment article are always going to contain information that not everyone is happy with, this will be the same with topics such as abortion, religion, race, etc. We can't simply delete what we don't like just because we don't like it.

Regarding the uncited sentences, if the contributor who added this does not provide their references by tomorrow, I'll try to find them myself and add them to the article. Aine63 20:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK thank you. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 20:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ageism

Maybe you could get some of your pupils to be admins. I'm sure they would be more polite than some around at the mo. You are probably included in the "ageism" group I was referring to. Anyone over the age of 28 and under the age of 17 definitely qualifies. Include anyone who has a job, goes to school or is in a pram too. wallie 20:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No I can't do that to them. They like me! Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 20:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My daughter was a teacher in her gap year at a prep school called Handcross. Do you know it? wallie 21:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No I'm afraid not :-( Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 21:32, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Handcross is just north of Brighton. [1] wallie 22:26, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CALM DISCUSSION IN A HEATED ENVIRONMENT

Object: FUCT & ERIK BRUNETTI on Wikipedia.

Situation: Wikipedia editors continuously deleting posts for BOGUS reasons.

I have been posting & re-posting & will continue to re-post the FUCT page as well as the Erik Brunetti page on Wikipedia. The information posted is acurate and verifiable. It is NOT copyright material and is of an objective point of view. I would like to know for what reason the pages keep on getting "moved" and so far have gotten NO EXPLANATION what so ever.

My conclusion is that these so-called EDITORS are frustrated teen-agers that don't know their head from their a** & think it's entertaining to delete pages. That, or this site has serious problems.

I would really be interested in hearing one of these "editors" comments on the information. What their expertise on FUCT is, and how well they know Mr. Brunetti.

But of course, I have yet to hear from any of them. So I stick to my conclusion. Anyway, I know I am right.

So, Miss, how exactly can you help ?

Well one thing you could do is sign your posts so I know who is talking to me. Secondly you can follow the advice on your talk page about what to do with self written material that looks like a copyvio. That way we know for sure that you really do own the meterail you are posting here. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 08:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WOW

You guys are AMAZING.

Emmy Lou Paris is my DJ name. So is Emmanuelle.

They are stage names.

Elle Rosenthal is a fictuous name as well.

DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ ON THE WEB?

AGAIN: HAS ANYONE CONTACTED www.brghtnghts.com to ask this person WHERE he took his material?

NO. NO ONE HAS DONE THAT.

the URBAN DICTIONNARY, who by the way, I have been threatening to SUE, has NO RIGHT to have what is written on it's page.

FUCT HAS A LAWYER ON THE CASE.

THIS WEBSITE IS TERRIBLE.