Jump to content

User talk:DevSolar: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DevSolar (talk | contribs)
Vfrickey...: new section
DevSolar (talk | contribs)
Line 38: Line 38:
== Vfrickey... ==
== Vfrickey... ==


...if you have a problem ''communicating'' with other people (as opposed to condescend to them), that's ''your'' problem, not mine. I would suggest checking out the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk#Editing_comments | talk page guidelines]], both with regards to the article talk page in question ''and'' your conduct on your own talk page. But there you are, I'm keeping away from "your" talk page since it apparently upsets you so much.
...if you have a problem ''communicating'' with other people (as opposed to condescend to them), that's ''your'' problem, not mine. I would suggest checking out the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk#Editing_comments talk page guidelines], both with regards to the article talk page in question ''and'' your conduct on your own talk page. But there you are, I'm keeping away from "your" talk page since it apparently upsets you so much.


On a sidenote, I don't care two cents whether you are the user I disagreed with earlier in the article, or any other article. I try to actively ''not'' keep track of past conduct. I would have given feedback to ''any'' user who repeatedly edits year-old talk page entries if it came to my attention - and will continue to do so, with the noteable exception of your person. Harrassing, my behind. -- [[User:DevSolar|DevSolar]] ([[User talk:DevSolar#top|talk]]) 08:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
On a sidenote, I don't care two cents whether you are the user I disagreed with earlier in the article, or any other article. I try to actively ''not'' keep track of past conduct. I would have given feedback to ''any'' user who repeatedly edits year-old talk page entries if it came to my attention - and will continue to do so, with the noteable exception of your person. Harrassing, my behind. -- [[User:DevSolar|DevSolar]] ([[User talk:DevSolar#top|talk]]) 08:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:09, 11 February 2013

Welcome!

Hello DevSolar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help pages

Tutorial

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Solar

Hallo DevSolar!

Ich schaue im Moment nur mal flüchtig über die Artikel im Project on German football und gebe denen dann nach meiner Einschätzung eine "Note". Sinn der Übung ist, dass man anschließend ganz gut schauen kann, welche Artikel überarbeitet werden sollten (hohe Bedeutung bei niedriger Qualität) Dieses Vorgehen kann natürlich mal schiefgehen und Du kannst die Bewertung jederzeit ändern, falls Du der Meinung bist, sie sei unangemessen, aber auch auf den zweiten Blick scheint sie mir im Fall des SC Verl zutreffend zu sein.

Der Artikel hat derzeit keine Inlince Citations. Das ist eine Grundvoraussetzung für einen B-Class Artikel. (schau mal unter Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Assessment und klappe die Kriterien für einen B-Class Artikel auf). Wahrscheinlich stützen die External references, die Du angibst, das was in dem Artikel steht. Das habe ich nicht überprüft. Wie gesagt: Evaluation auf den ersten Blick. Aber bei einem B-Class Artikel sollten die meisten Fakten zumindest grob durch Inlince Citations abgedeckt werden. Supporting Materials sind bisher auch nicht so recht vorhanden (von dem Wappen und dem Trikot mal abgesehen).

Der Artikel ist auch nicht sehr umfangreich. Das ist nicht abwertend gemeint und es ist vielleicht auch weder leicht noch unbedingt nötig bei einem 4. Ligisten einen 20seitigen Artikel zu haben, aber die Grundstruktur für einen Vereinsartikel sollte wie hier beschrieben aussehen. Was da steht ist natürlich nicht alles notwendig für einen B-Class Artikel, aber als Anregung ist es nicht schlecht, denke ich.

Ich hoffe die Antwort hilft, ansonsten einfach rück- und weiterfragen...

Grüße, OdinFK (talk) 09:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mabach

Sir,
I really don’t know what you’re talking about me editing “MaBach Engines.” I know nothing about German tank engines (though I confess, I was under the impression they ran on diesel, not gas, and that only Americans were stupid enough to use gasoline in tank engines, but that’s really neither here nor there I suppose). Uh, ¿are you SURE you got the right guy? Trying To Make Wikipedia At Least Better Than The ''Weekly World News.'' (talk) 07:11, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Season's tidings!

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:59, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vfrickey...

...if you have a problem communicating with other people (as opposed to condescend to them), that's your problem, not mine. I would suggest checking out the talk page guidelines, both with regards to the article talk page in question and your conduct on your own talk page. But there you are, I'm keeping away from "your" talk page since it apparently upsets you so much.

On a sidenote, I don't care two cents whether you are the user I disagreed with earlier in the article, or any other article. I try to actively not keep track of past conduct. I would have given feedback to any user who repeatedly edits year-old talk page entries if it came to my attention - and will continue to do so, with the noteable exception of your person. Harrassing, my behind. -- DevSolar (talk) 08:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]