User talk:Magore: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:24, 18 May 2006

Yep, this is my talk page. Probably the most interesting discussion on Wiki? ;-)

Well, fair enough

Since you actualy bothered to come and tell me you'd reverted one of my comments, I suppose I should say something. I WAS going to say that you were wrong, but you're not. I think the vampire page should cover everything, but that's another battle to fight. Thanks for steering me straight :) -Litefantastic 01:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No...

Im pretty sure I fixed a spelling mistake..."navitgate" to "navigate" cartar

Well, you didn't.

/Magore 22:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Yes I did....how did I not? Cartar..

The revision history says you didn't. The revision history don't lie[1]. 216.46.129.159 is the IP# you used when you wrote your first message here. Enough about this. /Magore 20:47, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ghosts

I assume that you were talking to User:211.30.212.33. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:58, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Viking Ships

Hi. I just saw your edits. I wanted to know what references you had, because after deleting a referenced part, you failed to source what you wrote in. --OrbitOne ^[Talk|Babel] 08:52, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My answer on user's talk page. /Magore 09:06, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder...

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.

— Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 03:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Headgear

Your claim about my blocking of schuminweb is completely untrue. I uphold WP policy, irrespective of whether I agree with it or not. Schuminweb unilaterally doctored the content of a project page to create the opposite impression to that created by its authors. He then proceeded to use his falsified version of the page to mass delete a template and replace it with the one he had pretended, through doctoring of the page, was the project template. No user can do that. He was repeatedly warned to stop. Other users asked him to stop. He ignored all calls to stop. As a result, in accordance with WP rules, after being warned he was blocked. That is standard procedure and is done by whichever admin finds it happening. No user is allowed to falsify contents of protect, naming convention or manual of style pages and then begin mass deletions on that basis. He was only blocked for 24 hours. Other users have in the past been blocked for such antics for far far longer. One some months ago was blocked indefinitely by another admin. Schuminweb was very lucky to have only got a short block for such a serious act. Falsing pages and mass deletions across pages invariably leads to a block. It sometimes leads to a request to the arbcom to ban a user from those pages. Please withdraw your totally untrue statement. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 23:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Facts - You are the administrator who blocked Schuminweb, and it was done during your dispute over the Headgear template. /Magore 09:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Reedy_Boy#Your_edits_to_France

Thankyou for informing me. I wasn't looking for vandalism, just was checking edits by AutoWikiBrowser

Thanks for Re-adding my changes

Reedy Boy 16:24, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 :Facts - You are the administrator who blocked Schuminweb, and it was done during your dispute over the Headgear template. /[[User:Magore|Magore]] 09:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
+== Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Reedy_Boy#Your_edits_to_France ==
+Thankyou for informing me. I wasn't looking for vandalism, just was checking edits by AutoWikiBrowser
+Thanks for Re-adding my changes
+[[User:Reedy Boy|Reedy Boy]] 16:24, 18 May 2006 (UTC)