Jump to content

Talk:Sculptor Capital Management: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Monstermike99 (talk | contribs)
Created page with '==Controversy and Criticisms== These sections seem to be overreaching. The authors of both articles even use the words "speculate" and "suspicious" in their asso...'
 
Stlamanda (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Controversy and Criticisms==
==Controversy and Criticisms==
These sections seem to be overreaching. The authors of both articles even use the words "speculate" and "suspicious" in their associations of Och-Ziff. This falls under the Wiki guideline of [[Wikipedia:Fringe theories]]. Kind of like charging the knife manufacturer with murder. Plus all the tangent parties that compromise the majority of the content, like [[Zanu-PF]], [[Robert Mugabe]], [[Walter Hennig]] and [[Tokyo Sexwale]], have their own Wiki pages that address these issues. Any thoughts? --[[User:Monstermike99|Monstermike99]] ([[User talk:Monstermike99|talk]]) 20:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
These sections seem to be overreaching. The authors of both articles even use the words "speculate" and "suspicious" in their associations of Och-Ziff. This falls under the Wiki guideline of [[Wikipedia:Fringe theories]]. Kind of like charging the knife manufacturer with murder. Plus all the tangent parties that compromise the majority of the content, like [[Zanu-PF]], [[Robert Mugabe]], [[Walter Hennig]] and [[Tokyo Sexwale]], have their own Wiki pages that address these issues. Any thoughts? --[[User:Monstermike99|Monstermike99]] ([[User talk:Monstermike99|talk]]) 20:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

: Monstermike99, that's interesting, but I think an article with a counter point of view is needed here to move further. Have you found any? --[[User:Stlamanda|Stlamanda]] ([[User talk:Stlamanda|talk]]) 21:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:55, 19 February 2013

Controversy and Criticisms

These sections seem to be overreaching. The authors of both articles even use the words "speculate" and "suspicious" in their associations of Och-Ziff. This falls under the Wiki guideline of Wikipedia:Fringe theories. Kind of like charging the knife manufacturer with murder. Plus all the tangent parties that compromise the majority of the content, like Zanu-PF, Robert Mugabe, Walter Hennig and Tokyo Sexwale, have their own Wiki pages that address these issues. Any thoughts? --Monstermike99 (talk) 20:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Monstermike99, that's interesting, but I think an article with a counter point of view is needed here to move further. Have you found any? --Stlamanda (talk) 21:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]