User talk:Schenka

Schenka, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Schenka! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Review of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/SignatureMD

Hi Schenka,

I have tried submitting my article a few times, each time to no avail. I have tried each time to conform more towards the suggested edits, but I'm not sure how to proceed anymore. The article is already short, and I have referenced a few major publications that discuss both the industry and the company itself. Do you have any more clear suggestions as to how I can proceed, because at the moment I'm not sure what to do.

Thanks for your time, and I appreciate your help.

SeoAvanian (talk) 23:30, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Review of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Salesgossip

Hi Schenka,

I recently submitted an article about an organisation and provided all independant and reliable references. I was wondering what makes the article to get declined.

I really appreciate if you can let me know, how to make it more neutral.

Thank you

Review of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talks:Articles_for_creation/SOGAZ

Hi Schenka!

I have problem, too. I was creation article about russian insurance company SOGAZ (rus. СОГАЗ). If honesty, I just translate russian article about it (from russian wikipedia) and all sourses take from it. But I was take massage, what my article like advertisment and my sourses is bad. Do you want say, what this article good for russian wikipedia, but bad for english wikipedia? If no, what do you mean? Say me, please, if you can, what I can do for make my article more neutral?

Thank you! 213.87.241.223 (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.87.241.223 (talk) 19:23, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Nucleair industry summiteit 2014

Dear Shenka,

You declined a new Wikipedia page on the Nuclear Industry Summiteit 2014.

Please note Thatcher the Nuclear Industry Summits form a serie of events. The previous event, the Nuclear Industry Summits 2012, held in Seoul does have a Wikipedia page. So I think it would be correct of the Nuclear Industry Summit also gets its Wikipedia page.

Could you please reconsider your decision?

Thanks Anno Keizer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.88.189.22 (talk) 23:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Reynolds Equation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Freebirds ^Howdy! 19:51, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Review of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Solentive_Technology_Group

Hi Schenka,

Thank you for reviewing our article and providing feedback on how we can improve it.

We have gone through your notability and guidelines pages and we believe we meet the criteria. Please see our explanation below.

Your golden rule page states that “Articles require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject”. We have provided a number of references that have been written by sources independent to us which are highly reliable.

Below is a list of the references we have cited that meet this criteria:

• BRW Magazine - BRW is a leading national Australian magazine that has run a number of articles mentioning our company including a full page article on our company

- Khadem, N (Jun 21 - Aug 1, 2012). "Kung Fu Fighters Work Better". BRW Best Places to Work. ISSN 0727-758X: 27.

- Khadem, N (2012). "How bosses can help working women stay fit". BRW. Retrieved 02/11/2012.

- "The 50 Best Places to Work". BRW (Best Places to Work): 43. Jun 21 - Aug 1, 2012. ISSN 0727-758X.

• Published book - that features a full page on our company

- Cain, A. & Koch, D. (2009). Strap on the Parachute. Wilkinson Publishing. pp. 121–122. ISBN 9781921332708.

• SMH – a leading NSW, Australia based newspaper that ran an opinion piece with contribution from our company

- McMahon, N. (2007). "Your whole life is going to bits". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 31 January 2013.

• The Midday Report – is a national news service produced by the ABC (Australia) that featured an independent news story about our company.

As per the information on your notability page:

1. No matter how "important" editors may personally believe an organization to be, it should not have a stand-alone article in Wikipedia unless reliable sources independent of the organization have discussed it - We believe the sources outlined above meet the criteria of independent sources that have discussed our company. These include a national magazine, a regional newspaper, a published book and a national news service.
2. A primary test of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself (or its manufacturer, creator, or vendor) have actually considered the company, corporation, product or service notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial, non-routine works that focus upon it – All sources listed above have written and published non-trivial, non-routine works that focus upon our company.
3. Sources used to support a claim of notability include independent, reliable publications in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations – The sources we have referenced above include a newspaper article, a book, a television news story and a leading business-focused magazine.
4. A "reliable source" is something that is generally trusted to tell the truth. A major newspaper, a factual, widely-published book, high-quality mainstream publications with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy: these are all what Wikipedia calls "reliable". Not reliable: MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, fansites, (most) blogs, Twitter. There must be reliable sources for the content of the article to meet the Wikipedia requirement of being verifiable. – All sources we have provided meet the criteria as generally trusted to tell the truth.

We are a small business but we believe we are making a difference and have been noticed in a number of publications. As per your notability page which states - smaller organizations and their products can be notable, just as individuals can be notable. Arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations or their products. – We believe we fall into this category.

We strongly believe that given our range of independent, reliable references we meet the criteria to warrant a stand-alone article on Wikipedia.

We understand that Wikipedia has to be mindful and apply strict criteria as to who is provided a stand-alone page – we are not trying to be difficult but truly believe that based on the criteria outlined on Wikipedia and the references we have provided we do satisfy the criteria of notability.

Thank you, Tanya Taouil (talk) 05:03, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Nuclear Industry Summit 2014

Dear Shenka,

Responding to your suggestion, I don't think the topics of "Nuclear security Summit" and "Nuclear Industry Summit 2014" should be combined. They are different Summits, for different audiences. I am sure that over time the topic Will grow further als we get closer to the Summit date (23 - 25 March). I think currently it is a bit to early for the references you ask for, but I am sure that they Will come.

I also see that the content that I am proposing is already more than the info on the Nuclear Security Summit page. I would appreciate of you could accept the page I proposed.

Thank you verf Munch.

Anno Keizer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anno Keizer (talk • contribs) 21:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Nuclear Industry Summit 2014

Dear Shenka,

Responding to your suggestion, I don't think the topics of "Nuclear security Summit" and "Nuclear Industry Summit 2014" should be combined. They are different Summits, for different audiences. I am sure that over time the topic will grow further als we get closer to the Summit date (23 - 25 March 2014). I think currently it is a bit to early for the references you ask for, but I am sure that they will come.

I also see that the content that I am proposing is already more than the info on the Nuclear Security Summit page. I would appreciate of you could accept the page I proposed.

Thank you very much

Anno Keizer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anno Keizer (talk • contribs) 21:58, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

review of page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Nicolas_V%C3%A9rin

Hello, I'm pleased you reviewed the page of Nicolas Vérin, french composer. I eventually added lots of references (ISBN and links) but i am not shure of the way to show them. As you see in the page, links inside references are numbered too, so this is confusing. Should i put links differently ?

I also discussed through IRC and i must find a reference for the "Villa Médicis hors les murs" award.

Thanks for your review. Brouits (talk) 01:06, 25 February 2013 (UTC)