Jump to content

Talk:Moral obligation: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Distinguish legal organizations from religious organizations that bring about changes in moral obligations
Comparing ''moral obligation'' in 1) law and 2) equity
Line 3: Line 3:
--- Begin working area container
--- Begin working area container


==Traditional sources
===Traditional sources===


Moral obligations in the religions consist of quehaceres y prohibiciones, ambos. R.C. & P.C. Urges and restraints examples.
Moral obligations in the religions consist of quehaceres y prohibiciones, ambos. R.C. & P.C. Urges and restraints examples.
Line 9: Line 9:
* Religious organizations creating moral obligations. Churches, synagoges, and mosques creating laws based on "God said."
* Religious organizations creating moral obligations. Churches, synagoges, and mosques creating laws based on "God said."
* Legal organizations creating moral obligations. Legislatures and courts creating laws based on the estimated effect that the law will have.
* Legal organizations creating moral obligations. Legislatures and courts creating laws based on the estimated effect that the law will have.
** Courts "at law" did not traditionally enforce mere ''moral obligations.'' But in some cases, equity enforced moral obligations, such as under an [[unjust enrichment]] or a[[promissory estoppel]] theory.
*** Work item. Expand [[Law of obligations]] page. Create the [[unjust enrichment]] page.
* Sometimes Religious overlaps with Legal.
* Sometimes Religious overlaps with Legal.




==Modern evidence for genetic triggers of moral obligation==
===Modern evidence for genetic triggers of moral obligation===


The Harvard anthropologist Richard Wrangham has summarized the behavioral similarities in the urges and restraints on action between [[Human|men]] and [[chimpanzee]]s in his 1996 book ''Demonic Males.'' According to Wrangham, "Very few animals live in patrilineal, male-bonded communities wherein females routinely reduce the risks of inbreeding by moving to neighboring groups to mate. And only two animal species are known to do so with a system of intense, male-initiated territorial aggression, including lethal raiding into neighboring communities in search of vulnerable enemies to attack and kill. Out of four thousand mammals and ten million or more other animal species, this suite of behaviors is known only among chimpanzees and humans." [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/demonicmales.htm]
The Harvard anthropologist Richard Wrangham has summarized the behavioral similarities in the urges and restraints on action between [[Human|men]] and [[chimpanzee]]s in his 1996 book ''Demonic Males.'' According to Wrangham, "Very few animals live in patrilineal, male-bonded communities wherein females routinely reduce the risks of inbreeding by moving to neighboring groups to mate. And only two animal species are known to do so with a system of intense, male-initiated territorial aggression, including lethal raiding into neighboring communities in search of vulnerable enemies to attack and kill. Out of four thousand mammals and ten million or more other animal species, this suite of behaviors is known only among chimpanzees and humans." [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/demonicmales.htm]

Revision as of 02:43, 24 August 2004

Working area on urges and restraints

--- Begin working area container

Traditional sources

Moral obligations in the religions consist of quehaceres y prohibiciones, ambos. R.C. & P.C. Urges and restraints examples.

  • Religious organizations creating moral obligations. Churches, synagoges, and mosques creating laws based on "God said."
  • Legal organizations creating moral obligations. Legislatures and courts creating laws based on the estimated effect that the law will have.
  • Sometimes Religious overlaps with Legal.


Modern evidence for genetic triggers of moral obligation

The Harvard anthropologist Richard Wrangham has summarized the behavioral similarities in the urges and restraints on action between men and chimpanzees in his 1996 book Demonic Males. According to Wrangham, "Very few animals live in patrilineal, male-bonded communities wherein females routinely reduce the risks of inbreeding by moving to neighboring groups to mate. And only two animal species are known to do so with a system of intense, male-initiated territorial aggression, including lethal raiding into neighboring communities in search of vulnerable enemies to attack and kill. Out of four thousand mammals and ten million or more other animal species, this suite of behaviors is known only among chimpanzees and humans." [1]

Restraint from sexual relations among close kin

The Bible says, ... (give the Biblical discouragement of incest).

Chimpanzee communities ...

That is, chimpanzee females are under a genetic restraint to refrain from sex with family members. At puberty, a female chimpanzee normally migrates to the next community of males to live and mate.

Restraint from killing individuals in the same community

The Bible says, "Thou shalt not kill." And that commandment meant don't kill men in your own community. Regularly, God condoned or ordered the killing of men who were not relatives.


In comparing the DNA of the various animals on the earth today, many anthropologists have concluded that


Urge to raid the neighboring community to kill other males

Female restraint from competing for the hierarchy of governance

The Bible says, "Women be obedient to your husbands." And that moral obligation apparently has genetic origins from the ancestors of the chimpanzees.


Male urge to dominate females

Cite the low numbers of women in positions of authority, giving the National Legislature link [2]. Though it is more common for a woman to rise to alpha of the community than for a female chimpanzee to rise to be alpha of the community, the common trends of gender bias against females rising to become alpha of the community suggests that human bias against women is genetic in origin.

The evolutionary forces that adapted the bonobos to the ecology on the south side of the Zaire River apparently removed gender bias against women from bonobo genes.

Among bonobos, females form their own hierarchy of females which effectively neutralizes the power of males in the community. Observationally, when a male and female chimpanzee fight over food, the male wins. When a male and female bonobo fight over food, the outcome is about fifty-fifty.


Genetic mutations in bonobos that produce female equality

The bonobo female urge to unite to neutralize the power of the males in the community. Cite the observed political power and fruits of labor division.


--- End working area container ---Rednblu 08:24, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)