Talk:Sniper Wolf/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 04:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Review

I will take on this this week, as promised. Cheers! — ΛΧΣ²¹ 04:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Ok, starting this one.

Prose

• I am very satisfied with the prose. I didn't know why I didn't take this article before. Good work Niemti.

References

• The problem arises here. I am not satisfied with how the references are formatted. Would you mind going ahead and checking each reference and give them a proper format? I see information missing (for example, ref No.1 is missing publisher, author, date, accessdate) and several date formats mixed altogether. — ṞṈ 17:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Nothing else to note. — ṞṈ 17:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi, "Perfectly formatted citations are not required." (that's okay, most reviewers miss this part, I have to point it out often). --Niemti (talk) 17:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Btw, next I wanted to write about either Meryl, EVA or The Boss. Probably Meryl, and as for The Boss I feel someone else's going to it do now or eventually as she's now announced to be the protagonist of the next MG game. --Niemti (talk) 18:12, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

I know that perfectly formatted references are not needed, but I think they should have at least some order :) I know it won't cost too much to make them look pretty, and this would help just in case you want to take this article to FA. Cheers. — ṞṈ 18:28, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

I never try FA, because it's a chore and not fun. [1] has actually neither an author nor date, it's just database. --Niemti (talk) 18:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Oh. The accessdate and publisher may only be needed. I am still seeing the other refs with date issues ("Retrieved August 3, 2012." vs. "Retrieved 2013-02-17." vs. "7th May 2012."), and also you use commas in some refs, and periods in others. — ṞṈ 22:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

It's actually one of these things that I find to be a chore. Many of these refs were actually filled automatically, just using different Wikipedia tools for it. --Niemti (talk) 00:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

It is not that hard. I'm sure it won't take more than 5 minutes to make. I won't feel comfortable passing the article with the refs in its current state :/ — ṞṈ 16:29, 26 February 2013 (UTC)