Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests

TPm

I cannot comment on the main page, but I'd like to point out that two admins (KC and AR) asking for topic bans against each other on ANI is a good reason for ArbCom to take this case. 5.12.84.153 (talk) 11:20, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

I don't know. One could say it is a good reason to not take the case. Frankly I think KC was a little quick on the draw to close the discussion at the AN/I subpage for this request. It took this out of the hands of the community to replace it with an arbcom request. Not like they have to take up the case, but now the discussion is permanently closed. I can agree with the closing but for different reasons. I simply think that the DR process has been somewhat ignored. But i also believe in the good faith of KC.--Amadscientist (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

E-mailing arbcom about an issue that should not be discussed on the open forum

Unrelated to the current Teaparty issue, I have been advised to email arbcom about an issue recently raised. Is there an arbcom e-mail or some individual I should contact?--Amadscientist (talk) 11:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

At WP:ARBCOM, see "Contacting the Committee". Johnuniq (talk) 22:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I was not able to deal with this today so I should have something out in the next few days.--Amadscientist (talk) 07:03, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Use the arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org email, and you should be fine — ṞṈ 16:33, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Simple notification

I noticed that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution of Serbs and other non-Albanians in Kosovo, which I closed, was linked at the enforcement requests page, so I thought I'd best mention — it's now at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 February 25. If arbitrators or clerks have any arbitration-related input on this AFD, they should offer it fast, since five different people have expressed opinions already even though it was filed less than an hour ago. Nyttend (talk) 22:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)