User talk:Ceraurus: Difference between revisions
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The unblock template was added without a reason so I've removed it. If you wish to be unblocked, provide a reason. {{tlp|unblock|Reason goes here}} [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 17:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC) |
The unblock template was added without a reason so I've removed it. If you wish to be unblocked, provide a reason. {{tlp|unblock|Reason goes here}} [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 17:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
{{unblock|Sock puppetry allegation unfounded and unproven; no attempt at any kind of discussion or adjudication.}} |
<nowiki>{{unblock|Sock puppetry allegation unfounded and unproven; no attempt at any kind of discussion or adjudication.}}</nowiki> |
||
: As noted by the blocker above, checkuser verified. You had previously agreed not to do such activity, so discussion had occurred. --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">[[User_talk:Pgk|talk]]</font>)</sup> 11:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:57, 20 May 2006
Nice clean slate...
Please don't remove an sprotected tag from a protected article. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:28, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
indef. block
despite your nice clean slate, you used a checkuser verified ip to skirt 3rr regulations while reverting Rachel Marsden, so you've again been indefinitely blocked. i don't mean for this to remain permanent- it is, as i said, indefinite, and if you can convince another admin that you really won't screw up this time, that's ok with me. --He:ah? 02:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
I didn't skirt the 3rr rule with a sockpuppet. Several people use our computers at work.
I've been blocked for a month without contact or any sort of real process.
Ceraurus 23:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
The unblock template was added without a reason so I've removed it. If you wish to be unblocked, provide a reason. {{unblock|Reason goes here}} Stifle (talk) 17:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|Sock puppetry allegation unfounded and unproven; no attempt at any kind of discussion or adjudication.}}
- As noted by the blocker above, checkuser verified. You had previously agreed not to do such activity, so discussion had occurred. --pgk(talk) 11:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)