Talk:Demonic Males: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:43, 4 March 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Demonic Males article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The titre...

It sounds so... Mysandric. Is the book biased? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.176.80.65 (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The book is in no way misandric (not mysandric)and not biased at all. It illustrates the role male aggression plays in our history and society, but does not fail to mention increasing female violence, especially among teenagers. In an - unfortunately - short passage the role of women in the evolution of male aggressivity is mentioned: the sexual selection by women of aggressive mating partners has produced the dominant expansive male who has shaped human history from Alexander the Great via Caesar, Genghis Khan, Napoleon, to Mussolini, Stalin, Hitler and Mao. Regrettably this book has not been met with the attention it deserves. Ontologix (talk) 04:43, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 14:12, 13 April 2012 edit Colapeninsula (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 13,323 edits m Colapeninsula moved page Talk:Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence to Talk:Demonic Males: WP style is not to include subtitles in page names ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:43, 4 March 2013 edit undo Ontologix (talk \| contribs) 286 edits →The titre... Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	It sounds so... Mysandric. Is the book biased? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.176.80.65\|173.176.80.65]] ([[User talk:173.176.80.65\|talk]]) 15:43, 21 May 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		It sounds so... Mysandric. Is the book biased? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.176.80.65\|173.176.80.65]] ([[User talk:173.176.80.65\|talk]]) 15:43, 21 May 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			:The book is in no way misandric (not m''y''sandric)and not biased at all. It illustrates the role male aggression plays in our history and society, but does not fail to mention increasing female violence, especially among teenagers. In an - unfortunately - short passage the role of women in the evolution of male aggressivity is mentioned: the sexual selection by women of aggressive mating partners has produced the dominant expansive male who has shaped human history from Alexander the Great via Caesar, Genghis Khan, Napoleon, to Mussolini, Stalin, Hitler and Mao. Regrettably this book has not been met with the attention it deserves. [[User:Ontologix\|Ontologix]] ([[User talk:Ontologix\|talk]]) 04:43, 4 March 2013 (UTC)