Jump to content

Turncoat: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
removed the inexplicable link to the Colin Powell article in the "See Also"
(boxed) (talk | contribs)
m See also: see also
Line 40: Line 40:
*[[Defection]]
*[[Defection]]
*[[Dual loyalty]] in politics
*[[Dual loyalty]] in politics
*[[Flip-flop (politics)|Flip-flop]]
*[[Historical revisionism (negationism)]], falsification of history
*[[Historical revisionism (negationism)]], falsification of history
*[[History of the Soviet Union (1982–1991)]]
*[[History of the Soviet Union (1982–1991)]]

Revision as of 22:50, 5 March 2013

Report to the Führer about fight against gangs in Ukraine. Item 3 reads: "Turncoats (Überläufer) thanks to German propaganda"

A turncoat is a person who shifts allegiance from one loyalty or ideal to another, betraying or deserting an original cause by switching to the opposing side or party. In political and social history, this is distinct of being a traitor, as the switch mostly takes place under the following circumstances:

  • In groups, often driven by one or more leaders.
  • When the former cause driving and benefitting the person becomes inviable or too fraught with danger.

Historical context

Even in a modern historical context "turncoat" is often synonymous with the term "renegade", a term of religious origins having its origins in the Latin word "renegare" (to deny). Historical currents of great magnitude have periodically caught masses of people, along with their leaders, in their wake. In such a dire situation new perspectives on past actions are laid bare and the question of personal treason becomes muddled. One example would be the situation that led to the Act of Abjuration or Plakkaat van Verlatinghe, signed on July 26, 1581 in the Netherlands, an instance where changing sides was given a positive meaning.

The first written use of the term meaning "One who changes his principles or party; a renegade; an apostate" was by J. Foxe in Actes & Monumentes in 1570.[1]

Process

A mass-shift in allegiance by a population may take place during military occupation, after a nation has been defeated in war or after a major social upheaval, like a revolution. Following the initial traumatic times many of the citizens of the area in question quickly embrace the cause of the victors to benefit from the new system. This shift of allegiance is often done without much knowledge about the new order that is replacing the former one. In the face of fear and insecurity, the prime motive for a turncoat to draw away from former allegiances may be mere survival.

Often the leaders are the first to change loyalties, for they have had access to privileged information and are more aware of the hopelessness of the situation for their former cause. This is especially apparent in dictatorships and authoritarian states when most of the population has been fed propaganda and triumphalism and has been kept in the dark about important turns of events.

Aftermath

As time goes by, along with the embracing of life under the new circumstances comes a need of burying and rewriting the past by concealing evidence. The fear of the past coming to upset the newly-found stability is always present in the mind of the turncoat. The past is rewritten and whitewashed to cover former deeds. When successful, this activity results in the distortion and falsification of historical events.

Even after the death of a turncoat his family and friends may wish to keep uncomfortable secrets from the past out of the light. There is a fear of loss of prestige as well as a wish to honor the memory of a family member from the part of those who have experienced the positive side of the person.

In certain countries, individuals and organizations have actively investigated the past to bring turncoats to justice to face their responsibilities.[2]

Examples

There were many turncoats in:

See also

References

  1. ^ The Oxford English Dictionary "turncoat, n. and adj." cites "John Foxe · The first volume of the ecclesiasticall history contaynyng the actes and monumentes of thynges passed..in this realme · Rev. ed., 1570 (2 vols.)."
  2. ^ Jean-Paul Cointet, Epuration légale: 400 000 dossiers, moins de 800 morts; Historia (fr)
  3. ^ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/obituaries/article1934744.ece Kurt Waldheim, Austrian head of the UN who as president of his country was later tainted by charges of complicity in Nazi atrocities, Timesonline
  4. ^ Iran…The Untold Story
  5. ^ Daniel F. Ziblatt The adaptation of ex-communist parties to post-communist East Central Europe: a comparative study of the East German and Hungarian ex-communist parties
  6. ^ Declan McGeough, Voices of the Transition, A Political History of Spain 1975-1982