Talk:Serb enclaves in Kosovo: Difference between revisions
Kosovo Serb enclaves |
|||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
The copetent peopel (organisation) about the Kosovo statistic OSCE, is saying :'' It is noted that the 1991 census was highly politicised and is thus unreliable.'', beacouse of thate this NOTE must be putit in the data. E.x see: [http://www.osce.org/documents/mik/2005/12/1194_en.pdf] --[[User:Hipi Zhdripi|Hipi Zhdripi]] 00:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC) |
The copetent peopel (organisation) about the Kosovo statistic OSCE, is saying :'' It is noted that the 1991 census was highly politicised and is thus unreliable.'', beacouse of thate this NOTE must be putit in the data. E.x see: [http://www.osce.org/documents/mik/2005/12/1194_en.pdf] --[[User:Hipi Zhdripi|Hipi Zhdripi]] 00:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
::Maybe we can change name of the article into "Serb and Slavic Muslim inhabited areas in Kosovo" or something like that? [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 00:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:32, 21 May 2006
NPOV in many other articles
I, at least in my own opinion, find not only this article "Kosovo Serb enclaves" and the articles "Kosovo", but also many other related documents about Kosovo : UNMIK, Kosovo War, KFOR.... much like tilting towards Serbian-Nationalist side of viewpoint. It could had been the same author in all these doucments.
I had edit some parts of these 5 documents, not all and not quite much. but in my free time i tried to rectify these articles towards Wiki neutral traditions later. Cat12.
Re: NPOV in many other articles
The following are removed, which at least IMO are not neutral and definitely a volatile info. (The Kosovo Serbs, like many other ethnics, are scattered in Kosovo and not just some finite number of places)..Cat12:
- Ibarski Kolasin around Northern Kosovska Mitrovica, Leposavic, Zubin Potok and Zvecan
- Sirinicka Zupa with center in Strpce
- Kosovosko Pomoravlje around Gnjilane and Kosovska Kamenica
- Priluzje
- Gracanica with Laplje Selo
- Gorazdevac
- Bica
- Velika Hoca
What's this page about? A place? --Yacht 11:37, Dec 1, 2003 (UTC)
NPOV
I don't think "Kosovo Serb Enclaves are the few remaining areas of ... Kosovo where Serbs, Roma and other minorities live peacefully without the constant violence and intimidation (ethnic cleansing) of their Albanian neighbours" (Italics added for emphasis) is a very neutral way of putting it. Aecis
- ! agree. Nikola 10:03, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
No argumet
No argumet!!! please dont inteprete the documents
Sombody have putit this Kosovo place in Serbia stub or category or template here with out argumet. We dont have a argumet that Kosovo is part of S/M. We have tha Constitution of this countrie but we have the rez. 1244 wich is more importen for the Wikipedia and is saying that Kosovo it is a part of Yougoslavia and is prototoriat of UN. Till we dont have a clearly argument from UN, aricel about Kosovo must be out of this stub or category or template. Pleas dont make the discution with intepretation or the Law wich are not accordin to 1244. Everybodoy can do that but that is nothing for Wikipedia.--Hipi Zhdripi 04:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Kosovo Serb enclaves
The part witch dont have to do with serbs in Kosovo, must be delete from this article. I remenber you the article name is Serbs enclaves E.x Gora is not enklave and even ist a komunë. See the oficila side of Dragash.
The copetent peopel (organisation) about the Kosovo statistic OSCE, is saying : It is noted that the 1991 census was highly politicised and is thus unreliable., beacouse of thate this NOTE must be putit in the data. E.x see: [1] --Hipi Zhdripi 00:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe we can change name of the article into "Serb and Slavic Muslim inhabited areas in Kosovo" or something like that? PANONIAN (talk) 00:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)